2012
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superexpansion as a possible probe of accretion in 4U 1820-30

Abstract: The ultracompact X-ray binary 4U 1820-30 is well known for its ≈170-d superorbital modulation in X-ray flux and spectrum, and the exclusiveness of bursting behavior to the low hard "island" state. In May−June 2009, there was an exceptionally long 51-d low state. This state was well covered by X-ray observations and 12 bursts were detected, 9 with the high-throughput RXTE. We investigate the character of these X-ray bursts and find an interesting change in their photospheric expansion behavior. At the lowest in… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each sequence, we observed a pair of bursts within a few hours of each other, and a third burst some days earlier or later. We ultimately rejected one of these sequences, in 2009 May (MJD 54980; see also in’t Zand et al 2012) because there were significant variations in the persistent flux (and spectral shape) over the interval, and it was not possible to be confident about the recurrence time for the close pair of bursts, due to data gaps between them. This was not the case for the remaining train, in 1997 May (MJD 50572), and so we retained this set of bursts.…”
Section: Observations and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each sequence, we observed a pair of bursts within a few hours of each other, and a third burst some days earlier or later. We ultimately rejected one of these sequences, in 2009 May (MJD 54980; see also in’t Zand et al 2012) because there were significant variations in the persistent flux (and spectral shape) over the interval, and it was not possible to be confident about the recurrence time for the close pair of bursts, due to data gaps between them. This was not the case for the remaining train, in 1997 May (MJD 50572), and so we retained this set of bursts.…”
Section: Observations and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in't Zand & Weinberg (2010) reported evidence from RXTE/PCA data for edges during so-called "superexpansion" bursts from 4U 0614+091, 4U 1722−30, and 4U 1820−30. These are bursts with powerful photospheric radius expansion (PRE) phases, that very likely drive outflows (in't Zand et al 2012;Yu & Weinberg 2018). The edge energies were in the 5 -12 keV range, and were detected after the strong, initial expansion phase.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%