2022
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.879086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superficial Temporal Artery and Vein as Alternative Recipient Vessels for Intraoral Reconstruction With Free Flaps to Avoid the Cervical Approach With the Resulting Need for Double Flap Transfer in Previously Treated Necks

Abstract: BackgroundMicrovascular reconstruction remains challenging in previously operated and irradiated patients, especially when double flaps seem to be the only solution due to osteoradionecrosis. An alternative reconstructive option could be microvascular anastomosis to the temporal vessels to avoid the obligatory cervical incision.Methods and MaterialsAll consecutive cases between January 2013 and 2020 that underwent either mandibular resection and reconstruction with a free fibula flap (FFF) and another soft tis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In cases where conventional access routes are unavailable, alternative approaches may be considered. These alternatives encompass access through the nasolabial fold [26] and submandibular or preauricular approaches [27,28]. The intraoral microvascular anastomosis technique was initially documented by Givol et al in 1998, with its inaugural application observed in two cases involving anterior mandibular reconstruction [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cases where conventional access routes are unavailable, alternative approaches may be considered. These alternatives encompass access through the nasolabial fold [26] and submandibular or preauricular approaches [27,28]. The intraoral microvascular anastomosis technique was initially documented by Givol et al in 1998, with its inaugural application observed in two cases involving anterior mandibular reconstruction [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%