2021
DOI: 10.1007/jhep12(2021)069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superfield approach to interacting N = 2 massive and massless supermultiplets in 3d flat space

Abstract: Massive arbitrary spin supermultiplets and massless (scalar and spin one-half) supermultiplets of the N = 2 Poincaré superalgebra in three-dimensional flat space are considered. Both the integer spin and half-integer spin supermultiplets are studied. For such massive and massless supermultiplets, a formulation in terms of light-cone gauge unconstrained superfields defined in a momentum superspace is developed. For the supermultiplets under consideration a superspace first derivative representation for all cubi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(132 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 In 3d flat spacetime, see for example [68][69][70]. 13 We note that on-shell description of integer and half-integer massive supermultiplets was first found in [72].…”
Section: A Conventionsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…12 In 3d flat spacetime, see for example [68][69][70]. 13 We note that on-shell description of integer and half-integer massive supermultiplets was first found in [72].…”
Section: A Conventionsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Alternatively, cubic vertices for D = 3, N = 2 supersymmetric massive higher spins without central charges can be constructed, using the method described in the Appendix [53].…”
Section: General Argument For One Loop Amplitudesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, cubic vertices for D = 3, N = 2 supersymmetric massive higher spins without central charges can be constructed, using the method described in the appendix [59]. Before proceeding further, let us note, that the quantum consistency of the higher dimensional theory is not a priori preserved by the dimensional reduction, and therefore has to be checked separately [60].…”
Section: Jhep12(2022)002mentioning
confidence: 99%