1992
DOI: 10.1080/08827509208914216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superfine and Ultrafine Grinding— A Literature Survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
4

Year Published

1995
1995
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
19
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Another reason for concern could be the creation of fine dust particles if the target grain size is strongly decreased to compensate for low weathering rates. Even at grain size targets above 10 m, a certain share could be below this threshold [31], which implies potential health risks from respiration [32]. One possibility to overcome this problem would be the creation of a slurry to keep small particles on the ground.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another reason for concern could be the creation of fine dust particles if the target grain size is strongly decreased to compensate for low weathering rates. Even at grain size targets above 10 m, a certain share could be below this threshold [31], which implies potential health risks from respiration [32]. One possibility to overcome this problem would be the creation of a slurry to keep small particles on the ground.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A smaller target grain size increases the overall energy demand for the rock grinding (dependency shown in SI C) and thus costs. The production of ultrafine particles (<10 m) is technically feasible, but will require exceptionally large amounts of energy and special equipment, resulting in higher capital costs [31]. Higher capital and operation costs per ton of rock may also be expected due to longer processing times in the mills.…”
Section: Techno-economic Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also known that different ball mills (such as planetary and tumbling ball mills) destruct heavily the fibrous structure of wood (Fukuzawa et al 1982;Mikushina et al 2003) and cause a drastic decrease in the cellulose crystallinity (Gharpuray et al 1983;Rivers and Emert 1987;Stubičar et al 1998;Da Silva et al 2010). All mentioned mill types employ grinding media in the milling and are classified as media mills (Orumwense and Forssberg 1992), whereas nonmedia mills involve mills like jet, impact, and cutting mills. There are certain differences between the milling modes of these two milling types.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The choice of the equipment for superfine and ultrafine grinding depends on the end-use of product, required product size distribution, purity requirements, etc [37]. Comparison of the grinding performance of conventional ball mill and attrition mill has been reported and better performance of the latter was observed [38].…”
Section: Effect Of the Mixture Powder Methods On The Composites' Propementioning
confidence: 97%