2007
DOI: 10.1063/1.2816860
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superhumps: Comparison of observation, theory, and simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mayer et al 2002) formation and in simulating astrophysical accretion discs(e.g. Smith et al 2007) and stellar collisions (e.g. Freitag & Benz 2005;Dale & Davies 2006) and publicly-available SPH codes such as GADGET-2 by Springel (2005) have found widespread application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mayer et al 2002) formation and in simulating astrophysical accretion discs(e.g. Smith et al 2007) and stellar collisions (e.g. Freitag & Benz 2005;Dale & Davies 2006) and publicly-available SPH codes such as GADGET-2 by Springel (2005) have found widespread application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The period of the superhump (P sh ) is a few percent longer than those of the orbital period (P sh ). This slightly longer periodicity and the modulations are attributed to phase-dependent removal of the angular momentum in a tidally deformed eccentric disk (Whitehurst 1988;Hirose, Osaki 1990;Murray 1998;Smith et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%