2022
DOI: 10.1039/d2ew00407k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superhydrophobic nanoparticle-coated PVDF–HFP membranes with enhanced flux, anti-fouling and anti-wetting performance for direct contact membrane distillation-based desalination

Abstract: Synthesis and superposition of silicon oxide nanoparticles on the surface of PVDF–HFP membrane via one-step method provide high superhydrophobic, oleophobic and antifouling properties enhancing their performance in membrane distillation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This involved measuring the ethanol flux under a specified pressure within a given time. The Guerout–Elford–Ferry equation was used to calculate the average pore size d m (m) using the following formula: d normalm = true( 8 ( 2.9 1.75 ε ) n δ Q ε P A true) 1 / 2 where n is the viscosity of ethanol (1.04 × 10 –9 bar s), δ is the membrane thickness (m), Q is the flux per unit time (kg m –2 s –1 ), P is the operational pressure (bar), and A is the effective membrane area (m –2 ). Because oxygen plasma treatment reduces membrane thickness, different δ values were used for each membrane type untreated and plasma treated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This involved measuring the ethanol flux under a specified pressure within a given time. The Guerout–Elford–Ferry equation was used to calculate the average pore size d m (m) using the following formula: d normalm = true( 8 ( 2.9 1.75 ε ) n δ Q ε P A true) 1 / 2 where n is the viscosity of ethanol (1.04 × 10 –9 bar s), δ is the membrane thickness (m), Q is the flux per unit time (kg m –2 s –1 ), P is the operational pressure (bar), and A is the effective membrane area (m –2 ). Because oxygen plasma treatment reduces membrane thickness, different δ values were used for each membrane type untreated and plasma treated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed description of the membrane characterization methods can be found in our previous publication . Our methods include scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for the morphological characterization, water static contact angle (WSCA) and contact angle hysteresis (CAH) for the wetting properties evaluation, liquid surface tension, liquid entry pressure (LEP), porosity, and tortuosity measurements as well as active pore size determination by implementing the filtration velocity method . Additionally, a KRÜSS DSA 30S contact angle instrument was used for the surface energy measurements with the use of diiodomethane and DI water droplets of 5 μL and the implementation of the WORK model for the calculations …”
Section: Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%