2011
DOI: 10.1186/2191-0855-1-34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superhydrophobic poly(L-lactic acid) surface as potential bacterial colonization substrate

Abstract: Hydrophobicity is a very important surface property and there is a growing interest in the production and characterization of superhydrophobic surfaces. Accordingly, it was recently shown how to obtain a superhydrophobic surface using a simple and cost-effective method on a polymer named poly(L-lactic acid) (PLLA). To evaluate the ability of such material as a substrate for bacterial colonization, this work assessed the capability of different bacteria to colonize a biomimetic rough superhydrophobic (SH) PLLA … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure also reveals that the rougher surfaces were more favorable for adhesion, which is related to the fact that rougher surfaces present more surface area for the bacteria to interact with. In addition to a rougher surface, it has also been observed that the topography of a film affects bacterial adhesion, for example, grooves and scratches in the size range of bacteria increase binding potential between bacterial cells and the surface and therefore facilitates bacterial attachment and colonization . Moreover, in studying the role of polymer chemistry and topography in bacterial adhesion, Epaillard et al highlighted the impact of peak and valley distribution on the same scale as bacterial dimensions on the polymer surface; mechanical adhesion and cell entrapment in the hollow structures adds a further parameter to be taken into consideration for effective polymer film design.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure also reveals that the rougher surfaces were more favorable for adhesion, which is related to the fact that rougher surfaces present more surface area for the bacteria to interact with. In addition to a rougher surface, it has also been observed that the topography of a film affects bacterial adhesion, for example, grooves and scratches in the size range of bacteria increase binding potential between bacterial cells and the surface and therefore facilitates bacterial attachment and colonization . Moreover, in studying the role of polymer chemistry and topography in bacterial adhesion, Epaillard et al highlighted the impact of peak and valley distribution on the same scale as bacterial dimensions on the polymer surface; mechanical adhesion and cell entrapment in the hollow structures adds a further parameter to be taken into consideration for effective polymer film design.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dou et al [186] recreated the topology of the rose petal using different polymer mixtures, and reported that the greatest adhesion of Gram-positive bacteria occurred at an intermediate hydrophobicity. Sousa et al [187] showed that bacteria grew better on superhydrophobic PLLA substrates when incubated with S. aureus or P. aeruginosa for 24 hours compared to flat PLLA surfaces (2-log reduction). Fadeeva et al [75] produced Lotus leaf mimics using titanium substrates and laser ablation that produced features of 10-20 μm with dual roughness features of about 200 nm.…”
Section: Bacterial Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1720] These surfaces are typically fabricated either by covalently attaching molecules with low surface energies to a roughened surface or by roughening the surface of a material which is already hydrophobic. [7,17,21,22] Such surfaces are of interest for a diverse array of applications. For example, superhydrophobic surfaces have been used to reduce the attachment of marine organisms to ship hulls and reduce the drag forces within pipes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%