2021
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2020.1098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superhydrophobic substrates allow the generation of giant quasi-static bubbles

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the contact angle approaches 145°, the uncertainty to estimate D B increases and the model is not able to predict the bubble geometry for angles beyond this value (IV in Figure 6). The reason is that surfaces with θ > 150°, the so‐called “superhydrophobicity,” show very low wettability of the liquid phase and the gas phase tends to spread over the solid surface forming a thin film at the initial stages of bubble formation 41 . These superhydrophobic surfaces are not of practical interest for bubble generation as they result in bubble coalescence in multiple hole systems, drastically increasing D B .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the contact angle approaches 145°, the uncertainty to estimate D B increases and the model is not able to predict the bubble geometry for angles beyond this value (IV in Figure 6). The reason is that surfaces with θ > 150°, the so‐called “superhydrophobicity,” show very low wettability of the liquid phase and the gas phase tends to spread over the solid surface forming a thin film at the initial stages of bubble formation 41 . These superhydrophobic surfaces are not of practical interest for bubble generation as they result in bubble coalescence in multiple hole systems, drastically increasing D B .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to overcome this issue, a glycerol-water (GW) mixture was employed together with a superhydrophobic substrate (Rustoleum ® NeverWet™) coating the air injector. The necessary diameter of the superhydrophobic substrate was obtained using the correlation given by Rubio-Rubio et al 54 . The GW mixture composition was 74.16-74.89% in weight of glycerol, depending on the case.…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the physical properties of GW mixtures are not as stable as silicon oils, and therefore the values of the control parameters slightly varied from experiment to experiment. In addition, the established rising paths depended on the initial injection conditions, which were not exactly the same in all the experiments, since the bubbles were generated using a superhydrophobic substrate (see Rubio-Rubio et al 54 for more details) instead of a conventional injector as in Cases 1 and 2. Furthermore, bubble shape oscillations were observed along the rise of these bubbles.…”
Section: B Planar Zigzag Regimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This expansion, however, is not indefinite. Once the contact line reaches its maximum diameter, further air injection results in the vertical ascent of the bubble, culminating in its detachment from the surface under the influence of buoyancy 31 (Figure 3e and Movie S3). The mechanism of air spreading in a pyramid-shaped superhydrophobic surface can be explained as follows: when the surface has wedge-shaped grooves, an air−liquid interface forms between adjacent walls during air.…”
Section: Gas−liquid Interface Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%