2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-15443-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superior colliculus modulates cortical coding of somatosensory information

Abstract: The cortex modulates activity in superior colliculus via a direct projection. What is largely unknown is whether (and if so how) the superior colliculus modulates activity in the cortex. Here, we investigate this issue and show that optogenetic activation of superior colliculus changes the input-output relationship of neurons in somatosensory cortex, enhancing responses to low amplitude whisker deflections. While there is no direct pathway from superior colliculus to somatosensory cortex, we found that activat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The above results are compatible with the view that top-down processes underlying beta event generated are recruited with temporal precision for attentional suppression of irrelevant information, perhaps mediated by the effects of superior colliculus on higher-order thalamic nuclei (Gharaei et al, 2020). In this case, the faciliatory Class 1 responses arising from stimulus/event coincidence could be interpreted as an "error" signal indicating that inhibition arrived too late, and that the beta event timing should be adjusted.…”
Section: Anticipatory Beta Events As a Predictive Signaling And Learning Mechanismsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The above results are compatible with the view that top-down processes underlying beta event generated are recruited with temporal precision for attentional suppression of irrelevant information, perhaps mediated by the effects of superior colliculus on higher-order thalamic nuclei (Gharaei et al, 2020). In this case, the faciliatory Class 1 responses arising from stimulus/event coincidence could be interpreted as an "error" signal indicating that inhibition arrived too late, and that the beta event timing should be adjusted.…”
Section: Anticipatory Beta Events As a Predictive Signaling And Learning Mechanismsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…However, the cuneate has also been observed to project to the posterior thalamic nucleus, although this observation applies to parts of the cuneate in which afferent with high precision information from digit 2 may possibly not exist ( Berkley et al, 1986 ). In terms of brainstem pathways, the cuneate output has a high number of potential indirect routes ( Loutit et al, 2021 ) to the thalamus, including the superior colliculus ( Bezdudnaya and Castro-Alamancos, 2011 ; Gharaei et al, 2020 ). The cerebellar nuclei can be provided with cutaneous input via spinal interneurons and the lateral reticular nucleus ( Bengtsson and Jorntell, 2014 ; Jorntell, 2017 ), and has powerful input to the motor thalamus (VL) ( Jorntell and Ekerot, 1999 ), which is a potential explanation for the decoding of tactile digit 2 information we observed in this part of the thalamus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In agreement with this finding, it is anatomically well described that S1, MI, and S2 receive thalamocortical projections from POm ( Ohno et al, 2012 ; El-Boustani et al, 2020 ), that they are, respectively, interhemispherically connected ( Carvell and Simons, 1987 ; Kinnischtzke et al, 2014 ) and that they have corticothalamic projections to POm ( Alloway et al, 2008 ; Liao et al, 2010 ). Moreover, POm is a strong driver of activity in S1, S2, and M1 ( Theyel et al, 2010 ; Gambino et al, 2014 ; Casas-Torremocha et al, 2019 ; Zhang and Bruno, 2019 ; Gharaei et al, 2020 ) and bilateral sensory responses in S2 have also been described ( Debowska et al, 2011 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%