2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superior energy storage performance of PVDF-based composites induced by a novel nanotube structural BST@SiO2 filler

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To make a more comprehensive comparison of the energy storage properties between inorganic filler/polymer matrix composites and the all-organic composite, relevant studies are shown in Figure . , The breakdown strength of the inorganic filler/polymer matrix composites is mostly concentrated below 550 kV mm –1 with a lower energy storage efficiency, as shown in Figure , which is greatly related to the defects generated by the introduction of inorganic fillers. The all-organic composite in this work can effectively avoid the generation of similar defects, achieve a higher breakdown strength, and maintain high efficiency, which makes it have a higher energy storage density although without a higher dielectric constant like inorganic filler/polymer matrix composites.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To make a more comprehensive comparison of the energy storage properties between inorganic filler/polymer matrix composites and the all-organic composite, relevant studies are shown in Figure . , The breakdown strength of the inorganic filler/polymer matrix composites is mostly concentrated below 550 kV mm –1 with a lower energy storage efficiency, as shown in Figure , which is greatly related to the defects generated by the introduction of inorganic fillers. The all-organic composite in this work can effectively avoid the generation of similar defects, achieve a higher breakdown strength, and maintain high efficiency, which makes it have a higher energy storage density although without a higher dielectric constant like inorganic filler/polymer matrix composites.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19.0 @ 571.4 MV/m 61.2 PVDF [110] 1 vol.% SrTiO 3 @SiO 2 ~10 ~0.04 402 14.4 @ 402 MV/m ~55 PVDF [94] 3.6 vol.% BaTiO 3 @Al 2 O 3 ~12 ~0.02 420.6 10.58 @ 420 MV/m 1.47 63.85 PVDF [97] 5 wt.% BaTiO 3 @BNNS 840 ~11.5 0.027 610 17.6 @ 580 MV/m ~50 P(VDF-TrFE-CFE) [98] BNNS (6 vol.%)-BaTiO 3 (3.9 vol.%) ~42 ~0.031 527 15.82 @ 530 MV/m 1.08 ~75 P(VDF-HFP) [99] 3 vol.% BaTiO 3 -Bi(Li 0.5 Nb 0.5 )O 3 2600 ~11 0.026 478 14.2 @ 497 MV/m 55.5 >5×10 4…”
Section: D Nanofillersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hybrid and multicomponent nanomaterials have also been developed to improve the energy storage performance of fluoropolymers. BT can be either embedded to or embedded with a range of materials, such as TiO 2 , Al 2 O 3 , Fe 2 O 3 , SiO 2 , Ni, boron nitride (BN), etc [92][93][94][95][96][97][98][99][100] . For example, Zhang and coworkers prepared BaTiO 3 @TiO 2 nanofibers where BT nanoparticles (~50 nm in diameter) are dispersed into TiO 2 nanofibers (300 nm in diameter and tens μm in length) [92,93] .…”
Section: Nanocomposites With Multicomponent Nanofillersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the polarization from inorganic particles, the altered phase interface also provides strong interfacial polarization. [49] In spite of increased polarization, the breakdown strength of the nanocomposites shows an obvious reduction especially for highly filled films, due to the low breakdown strength of inorganic particles as well as the electric field distortion at the interfaces caused by the incorporation of the foreign phase. [24] The influence of F127 on the D-E loops of nanocomposites was studied.…”
Section: Energy Storage Performance Of Bt@f127/p(vdf-hfp) Nanocompositesmentioning
confidence: 99%