1998
DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1998.tb04688.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superior Mesenteric Vein Thrombosis: Computed Tomography Diagnosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of these drawbacks, the American Gastrointestinal Association [49] concluded that CT is of limited use in the diagnosis of AMI and that unremarkable CT findings in the context of a high suspicion of mesenteric ischemia should prompt an angiography without delay. An exception to this rule is when superior mesenteric vein thrombosis is suspected; a situation where CT scan remains the test of choice with sensitivity rate in the range of 90% [14,50] . Recently, the multi-detector row CT has emerged as a widely established non-invasive technique that not only delineates the blood vessels, but also shows an anatomical three dimensional relationship with the surrounding tissues, and allows evaluation of tissue perfusion [58] .…”
Section: Imaging Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because of these drawbacks, the American Gastrointestinal Association [49] concluded that CT is of limited use in the diagnosis of AMI and that unremarkable CT findings in the context of a high suspicion of mesenteric ischemia should prompt an angiography without delay. An exception to this rule is when superior mesenteric vein thrombosis is suspected; a situation where CT scan remains the test of choice with sensitivity rate in the range of 90% [14,50] . Recently, the multi-detector row CT has emerged as a widely established non-invasive technique that not only delineates the blood vessels, but also shows an anatomical three dimensional relationship with the surrounding tissues, and allows evaluation of tissue perfusion [58] .…”
Section: Imaging Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity and specificity are 74% to 100% and 100%, respectively [49] . When used in the absence of peritonitis signs, angiography has been shown to improve the survival rate [50,51] . Mesenteric angiography can usually identify the underlying pathophysiologic event, by differentiating between embolic and thrombotic occlusion [52] .…”
Section: Imaging Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elle permet aussi de préciser les limites de la thrombose, de montrer une éventuelle extension aux veines collatérales, de rechercher une présence d'air dans le système porte ou la veine mésentérique ainsi que d’écarter une autre maladie à l'origine de la symptomatologie digestive [10]. L’échographie doppler aurait une bonne sensibilité pour la détection du thrombus ou d'une anomalie de flux dans la veine mésentérique mais il requiert un échographiste expérimenté et la rentabilité est moindre que celle de la tomodensitométrie [3, 13]. Il constitue un bon examen pour la surveillance de la reperméabilisation du système porte.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Cela explique en partie que dans le passé, le diagnostic était fait par laparotomie dans plus de 90 % des cas [4]. De nos jours, la tomodensitométrie abdominale semble être l'examen de choix avec une sensibilité supérieure à 90 % [17,18,20]. Dans notre étude, cette sensibilité est de 100 % car tous les patients avaient tous les signes directs et indirects de TVMS mais il s'agit d'une étude rétrospective.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified