2006
DOI: 10.3171/ped.2006.105.2.82
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superior outcomes in children compared with adults after microsurgical resection of brain arteriovenous malformations

Abstract: This analysis confirms the observation that children fare better than adults after microsurgical AVM resection. This discrepancy cannot be explained by differences in AVM anatomy, lesion rupture rates, presenting neurological condition, or treatment techniques, leading the authors to infer that neural plasticity may augment surgical tolerance and recovery in children. These findings bolster the choice of aggressive microsurgical management of AVMs and recalibration of surgical risk assessment in children.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1,3,5,6,20,25,28,30,34,40 By comparison, reports of surgical AVM series, summarized in Table 7, 2,5,8,9,[16][17][18]21,22,27,31 are sparse and contain fewer patients, but some describe better results after resection of AVMs in children than in adults. 31 Furthermore, as most pediatric AVMs in nearly all series are hemorrhagic, 2,8,9,16-18,22 a more aggressive, expedient therapy via microsurgery, as opposed to radiosurgery, should be sought in such cases. It is interesting to note that in the most recent iteration of radiosurgical grading schemes, hemorrhage was considered an adverse factor for radiosurgical success, 38 an assessment that differs from the observed impact of hemorrhage on the outcomes of microsurgery.…”
Section: Patient Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1,3,5,6,20,25,28,30,34,40 By comparison, reports of surgical AVM series, summarized in Table 7, 2,5,8,9,[16][17][18]21,22,27,31 are sparse and contain fewer patients, but some describe better results after resection of AVMs in children than in adults. 31 Furthermore, as most pediatric AVMs in nearly all series are hemorrhagic, 2,8,9,16-18,22 a more aggressive, expedient therapy via microsurgery, as opposed to radiosurgery, should be sought in such cases. It is interesting to note that in the most recent iteration of radiosurgical grading schemes, hemorrhage was considered an adverse factor for radiosurgical success, 38 an assessment that differs from the observed impact of hemorrhage on the outcomes of microsurgery.…”
Section: Patient Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reports of treatment outcome in moderate-to large-size pediatric cohorts are rare. 2,5,16,18,22,27,31 We reviewed our own surgical experience with AVMs to elucidate obliteration rates and treatment results in the context of an evolved institutional protocol. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complete resection rates are all high in the published series, ranging from 80% to 100%. 5,9,13,16,21 We believe the use of intraoperative ultrasound in combination with neuronavigation and integrated operative microscopy is a safe and reliable technique to aid AVM resection in pediatric patients. There are clear advantages in being able to position a smaller craniotomy directly over the intended target lesion: it minimizes blood loss from the craniotomy site and reduces incision length.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,[16][17][18] Arteriovenous malformations in the pediatric population have generally been associated with higher morbidity and mortality than those in adults, 11,18 although a recent study suggests that surgery may improve long-term outcomes. 21 There is also a well-described phenomenon of AVM recurrence following negative postresection angiography in the pediatric population. 7,11,18 Nonetheless, pediatric AVMs have been treated surgically, with endovascular embolization, with radiosurgery, and increasingly with multimodality treatments with good results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,13,42 A functional outcome was considered good when the patient could perform the activities of daily living independently (assessed as an mRS score ≤ 2), while the outcome was considered poor when the patient required assistance (mRS Score 3-5) or had died (mRS Score 6). Any causes of death were recorded.…”
Section: Patient Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%