2011
DOI: 10.1063/1.3589910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superior oxygen and glucose supply in perfusion cell cultures compared to static cell cultures demonstrated by simulations using the finite element method

Abstract: Oxygen and glucose supply is one of the important factors for the growth and viability of the cells in cultivation of tissues, e.g., spheroid, multilayered cells, and three-dimensional tissue construct. In this study, we used finite element methods to simulate the flow profile as well as oxygen and glucose supply to the multilayered cells in a microwell array chip for static and perfusion cultures. The simulation results indicated that oxygen supply is more crucial than glucose supply in both static and perfus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, no significant difference was observed between the high‐flow‐rate and low‐flow‐rate perfusion conditions. These results indicate that oxygen was supplied mainly through the gas‐permeable PDMS surface of the microfluidic chamber chip, which agrees with our previous study [16]. The distance from the bottom surface of the microwell to the upper layer of the medium was approximately 2.0 mm in the static culture but only 0.8 mm in the PDMS microfluidic chamber array chip.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, no significant difference was observed between the high‐flow‐rate and low‐flow‐rate perfusion conditions. These results indicate that oxygen was supplied mainly through the gas‐permeable PDMS surface of the microfluidic chamber chip, which agrees with our previous study [16]. The distance from the bottom surface of the microwell to the upper layer of the medium was approximately 2.0 mm in the static culture but only 0.8 mm in the PDMS microfluidic chamber array chip.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…As is typical for cell culture, nutrients and oxygen must be supplied to spheroid cultures [15, 16]. The removal of waste metabolites is also important [17, 18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of the former of these approaches are short‐lived, as cell proliferation and matrix deposition quickly fill the void space in the nanoporous hydrogels, and the latter approach requires large pressure heads, due to the low permeability of the constructs. Embedded microfluidic channels offer the potential to maximize the perfusion capacity, create spatial complexity and allow control over the spatial and temporal presentation of hydrodynamic and chemical cues within the developing construct (Bettinger and Borenstein, ; Bettinger et al ., ; Borenstein et al ., ; Choi et al ., ; Golden and Tien, ; Huang et al ., ; Johann and Renaud, ; Khademhosseini et al ., ; Ling et al ., ; Song et al ., ; Sugiura et al ., ). Methods for the production of the microfluidic channels include moulding (Borenstein et al ., ; Choi et al ., ; Ling et al ., ), bioprinting (Boland et al ., ; Lee et al ., ), photopatterning (Cuchiara et al ., ; Lee et al ., ) and use of sacrificial elements (Golden and Tien, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[10][11][12][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] Some of them report on partial 3D cell culture patterning by arrays of posts, [10][11][12] requiring delicate injection pressure control 10 and, therefore, preventing wide spread application. At the same time, PDMS has several other disadvantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%