2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.12.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superior parietal cortex and the attention to delayed intention: An rTMS study

Abstract: Prospective memory (PM) is the ability to remember to carry out an intention when the appropriate cue occurs. This study aimed to investigate whether the superior parietal cortex is causally involved in PM and, if so, what is its functional role. We applied repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to the left and right superior parietal cortex, and we evaluated the TMS effects on two different PM tasks that required to direct the attention towards either the external stimuli ('Monitoring-load' task)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both blocks also presented a cost in terms of accuracy, which was greater for the Monitoring-Load block for both ongoing trials and PM cues, as in this condition it was more difficult to distinguish them. The fact that both PM cost and prospective errors were greater in the nonfocal condition is in line with the literature on focality (Cona et al, 2014) and with the outcomes of two previous experiments, in which the same paradigm proposed in this study-limited to the visual modality-was able to identify similar differences between these blocks (Cona et al, 2017(Cona et al, , 2020.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both blocks also presented a cost in terms of accuracy, which was greater for the Monitoring-Load block for both ongoing trials and PM cues, as in this condition it was more difficult to distinguish them. The fact that both PM cost and prospective errors were greater in the nonfocal condition is in line with the literature on focality (Cona et al, 2014) and with the outcomes of two previous experiments, in which the same paradigm proposed in this study-limited to the visual modality-was able to identify similar differences between these blocks (Cona et al, 2017(Cona et al, , 2020.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Hence, in this research, we propose for the first time an identical paradigm composed of multiple PM tasks in an auditory and a visual version, to explore the possible effects that different sensory modalities have on PM processing. Specifically, the paradigm is an extension of the one used by Cona et al (2017Cona et al ( , 2020, involving different PM tasks with varying levels of prospective and retrospective requests, as explained in detail in the "Method" section. The creation of an auditory version of the PM paradigm and its comparison with the same tasks performed in the visual modality will hopefully help clarify whether the effects found in the literature of PM are modality-dependent or whether this process is unaffected by sensory modality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that attention regulation is positively linked to emotion regulation (Wadlinger and Isaacowitz, 2011), and therefore the increased involvement of the superior parietal cortex may explain the MBSR group’s ability to selectively attend to their internal and external environment with awareness. A recent study similarly reported that the superior parietal cortex is causally involved in top-down allocation of attentional resources between external, ongoing stimuli and internal, prospective memory intentions; thus, it may lead to delayed intention (Cona et al, 2017). Furthermore, a recent multimodal neuroimaging study indicated that subregions of the SPL have different types of connectivity, reflecting different functions and interactions (Wang et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[63][64][65][66][67][68] Although numerous brain structures are involved in PM, the neural systems that are of most value towards understanding PM and PM failures are the frontal and parietal cortices (F/PC) and the hippocampus (HC). A vast literature has demonstrated that F/PC functioning underlies strategising, planning for the future and maintaining a representation of an intention, 64,[69][70][71] and that the HC is necessary for the formation of conscious memories. 72,73 A person without a functioning F/PC would have great difficulty in planning and strategising about the future and in multi-tasking.…”
Section: Neurobiology Of Rm and Pm Failuresmentioning
confidence: 99%