2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2021.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superior Rectal Artery Embolization with Tris-Acryl Gelatin Microspheres: A Randomized Comparison of Particle Size

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, using particles less than 900 µm showed minor complication: 45% rate of superficial ulcerations (<5 mm) at the embolized area, 7% of small recto-sigmoid junction ulcerations, and 2% of small fibrotic scar tissue in the treated zone. The only comparative study between different sizes of TAGp showed similar results in terms of HD control in all particle dimensions groups [25].…”
Section: Hemorrhoid's Embolization Outcome and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, using particles less than 900 µm showed minor complication: 45% rate of superficial ulcerations (<5 mm) at the embolized area, 7% of small recto-sigmoid junction ulcerations, and 2% of small fibrotic scar tissue in the treated zone. The only comparative study between different sizes of TAGp showed similar results in terms of HD control in all particle dimensions groups [25].…”
Section: Hemorrhoid's Embolization Outcome and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The use of particles also solves the issue of the recanalization of coils. Four papers reported the use of tris-acryl gelatin particles (TAGp); no comment on the rationale to TAGp use versus PVA particles was done by the authors [22,[24][25][26]. Nowadays, no data on the caliber of the anastomosis are available to understand the right particle size.…”
Section: Embolization Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In most of the published series, technical success rates of 90–100% have been reported, while clinical success rates range from 63% to 97% [ 11 , 12 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 ]. However, it is difficult to compare the results from the different series as there is no single and homogeneous criterion and standard that defines clinical success [ 7 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%