2006
DOI: 10.1177/112972980600700210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superior Vena Cava Thrombosis after Intravascular AICD Lead Extraction: A Case Report

Abstract: Pacemaker lead extraction has been shown to be an effective and safe treatment in the case of infected per-manent pacemaker leads. However, it can lead to potentially serious complications, usually occurring during the ex-traction procedure. This report describes a case of a 74-year-old male with a persistent superior vena cava thrombo-sis related to an infected permanent pacemaker lead transvenous extraction. Clinical and surgical management are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Septic thrombophlebitis of the axillary-subclavian axis, even though it is a rare condition, can occur when multiple leads are placed through the same vessel (e.g., CRT or abandoned leads). This complication is at very high risk of pulmonary embolism and an aggressive antithrombotic therapy is recommended before the explant of the whole device [ 41 ]. The diagnosis of CDRIE is still based on the modified Duke criteria, but many studies have highlighted some criticism about their predictive value in this setting [ 33 , 42 ].…”
Section: Cardiac Device-related Infective Endocarditis and Bacteriemiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Septic thrombophlebitis of the axillary-subclavian axis, even though it is a rare condition, can occur when multiple leads are placed through the same vessel (e.g., CRT or abandoned leads). This complication is at very high risk of pulmonary embolism and an aggressive antithrombotic therapy is recommended before the explant of the whole device [ 41 ]. The diagnosis of CDRIE is still based on the modified Duke criteria, but many studies have highlighted some criticism about their predictive value in this setting [ 33 , 42 ].…”
Section: Cardiac Device-related Infective Endocarditis and Bacteriemiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the device cannot be removed because of the comorbidities, suppression by prolonged antibiotic treatment may be considered (class IIb indication) (11). When there is septic thrombophlebitis on upper extremity veins where electrodes were implanted initially, anticoagulation therapy and delayed extraction until thrombus resolution may be considered due to increased risk of pulmonary embolism (43). The new device should be implanted to the contralateral venous system to prevent relapses.…”
Section: Timing For Implantation Of the New Devicementioning
confidence: 99%