2014
DOI: 10.1177/1742271x14529761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superiority of chlorhexidine 2%/alcohol 70% wipes in decontaminating ultrasound equipment

Abstract: Ultrasound equipment is known to act as a reservoir for potentially pathogenic organisms. The aims of these studies were to establish current cleaning practices, to review the extent of bacterial contamination of ultrasound equipment in our hospital, to establish an effective cleaning regimen and to ensure that cleaning does not cause damage. A questionnaire was sent to all acute NHS hospitals in England to establish current cleaning practices. A review of our current practice was performed to establish the ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One could be worried about the potential for physical degradation of the transducer head by the fortified gel. However, this concern has been put to rest by the work of Shukla et al who reported no damaging effect to the transducer when repeatedly wiped with 2% chlorhexidine/70% alcohol wipes 25…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One could be worried about the potential for physical degradation of the transducer head by the fortified gel. However, this concern has been put to rest by the work of Shukla et al who reported no damaging effect to the transducer when repeatedly wiped with 2% chlorhexidine/70% alcohol wipes 25…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use chlorhexidine/alcohol or soap-based wipes to clean transducer heads, as well as the entire length of probe cables, screen and cart after scanning. 35 Wait for up to 3 min ‘dry time’ after using disinfectant wipes before using the machine again.…”
Section: Lus Scanning Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microbial growth was inhibited by 85.2% 33 to 92.8% 30 with IPA compared to 92.5% 30,33 with ethyl alcohol, however, statistically the efficacy of EA and IPA remained same. Further studies revealed that 1% chlorhexidine (CH) also significantly reduced the bioburden and was superior to 70% IPA in preventing recontamination of the stethoscopes, however, there was no significant difference in the efficacy of IPA and CH 22,38 . Though IPA is widely used, the duration recommended is still unclear and the studies comparing the antimicrobial activity of various disinfectants on decontamination of stethoscope are scanty.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%