2023
DOI: 10.1175/bams-d-22-0070.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supermodeling: Improving Predictions with an Ensemble of Interacting Models

Abstract: The modeling of weather and climate has been a success story. The skill of forecasts continues to improve and model biases continue to decrease. Combining the output of multiple models has further improved forecast skill and reduced biases. But are we exploiting the full capacity of state-of-the-art models in making forecasts and projections? Supermodeling is a recent step forward in the multi-model ensemble approach. Instead of combining model output after the simulations are completed, in a supermodel indivi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the method presented in this work would benefit from further developments before it can be tested in a realistic system. Currently, several methods are being developed and tested within NorCPM to handle climate biases directly, namely: anomaly coupling (Counillon et al., 2021), multivariate parameter estimation (Singh et al., 2022), super‐resolution data assimilation (Barthélémy et al., 2022), and supermodeling (Counillon et al., 2023; Schevenhoven et al., 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the method presented in this work would benefit from further developments before it can be tested in a realistic system. Currently, several methods are being developed and tested within NorCPM to handle climate biases directly, namely: anomaly coupling (Counillon et al., 2021), multivariate parameter estimation (Singh et al., 2022), super‐resolution data assimilation (Barthélémy et al., 2022), and supermodeling (Counillon et al., 2023; Schevenhoven et al., 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%