2014
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/790/2/115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SUPERNOVA RELIC NEUTRINOS AND THE SUPERNOVA RATE PROBLEM: ANALYSIS OF UNCERTAINTIES AND DETECTABILITY OF ONeMg AND FAILED SUPERNOVAE

Abstract: Direct measurements of the core-collapse supernova rate (R SN ) in the redshift range 0 ≤ z ≤ 1 appear to be about a factor of two smaller than the rate inferred from the measured cosmic massivestar formation rate (SFR). This discrepancy would imply that about one half of the massive stars that have been born in the local observed comoving volume did not explode as luminous supernovae. In this work we explore the possibility that one could clarify the source of this "supernova rate problem" by detecting the en… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
76
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
(191 reference statements)
3
76
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Observationally, collapsars are expected (Mathews et al 2014) to only result from a very small fraction (0.04%) of stars in the range of 25 M < m < 125 M . On the other hand, the core collapse supernova rate involves progenitor stars in the range of 10 M < m < 25 M .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observationally, collapsars are expected (Mathews et al 2014) to only result from a very small fraction (0.04%) of stars in the range of 25 M < m < 125 M . On the other hand, the core collapse supernova rate involves progenitor stars in the range of 10 M < m < 25 M .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result is shown in Figure 1, which includes three lines due to the uncertainties of IMF (see equation (3)). Dotted lines indicate the upper and lower limits due to the uncertainties of SFR [4]. Adopted value M f S N min = 16.5 − 18 M ⊙ clearly solves the SNR problem, although it is important to notice that R T hr S N depends strongly on SFR.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…whereρ 0 = 0.0104 M ⊙ Mpc −3 yr −1 , α = 4.22, β = −0.20, γ = −11.30, B = 2.70 × 10 6 , C = 6.37 [4,12]. The total flux, dN tot ν /dE ν is the sum of neutrino fluxes from all types of SNe, and we estimate the detector event rate by…”
Section: Detection Rate Of Rsnmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2) [2,61,62]. In particular, neutrino fluxes from the latest supernova numerical simulations have been used, to include the effect of the cooling of the neutrino flux over several seconds.…”
Section: -5mentioning
confidence: 99%