1980
DOI: 10.1086/157925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supernovae in molecular clouds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
50
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that this is different from the distance assumed in previous papers describing X-ray and radio observations (Fabian & Terlevich 1996;Aretxaga et al 1999;Shull 1980;Wheeler et al 1980;Williams et al 2002;see Table 1). …”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…Note that this is different from the distance assumed in previous papers describing X-ray and radio observations (Fabian & Terlevich 1996;Aretxaga et al 1999;Shull 1980;Wheeler et al 1980;Williams et al 2002;see Table 1). …”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…Despite this the sharpness of the observed minimum cutoff in size suggests that the observed Arp220 SNRs are not embedded in densities > 10 5 cm −3 . This is either because such high-density gas has low volume filling factor in Arp220 or because SNRs become inefficient radio sources (Wheeler et al 1980) when embedded in such high-density regions.…”
Section: Comparison Of Sne and Snrs Sizesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not all of this energy goes into the mechanical feedback, as part of the energy is radiated away in thin, dense shells surrounding the bubbles created by the supernovae, that are unresolved in our simulations. We assume that 10% of the total supernova energy goes into mechanical feedback on the gas (Wheeler et al 1980;Silich et al 1996). The feedback is incorporated in the code with the use of pressure particles (Pelupessy et al 2004;Pelupessy 2005).…”
Section: Star Formation and Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%