1984
DOI: 10.1016/0093-691x(84)90332-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superovulation of bongo antelope () and interspecies embryo transfer to African eland ()

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interspecific and inter-subspecific embryo transfer may ultimately be a key technique for the rapid propagation of endangered deer populations, although rate of propagation will be limited by availability of suitable recipient animals which can successfully carry transferred embryos to term. Such techniques have been successful between species such as zebra (Equus burchellii) and horse (Equus caballus; Summers, 1986); mouflon (Ovis musimon) and sheep (Ovis aries; Bunch, Foote & Whitaker, 1977); gaur (Bos gaurus) and domestic cattle (Bos tuurus; Stover & Evans, 1984), and bongo (Tragelaphus euiyceros) and eland (Tragelaphus oryx ;Dresser et al, 1984). Inter-subspecific embryo transfer could be applied using safe subspecies as recipients for embryos collected from subspecies classified as critical or endangered.…”
Section: Interspecijic Embryo Transfer and Maternal Recognition Of Prmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interspecific and inter-subspecific embryo transfer may ultimately be a key technique for the rapid propagation of endangered deer populations, although rate of propagation will be limited by availability of suitable recipient animals which can successfully carry transferred embryos to term. Such techniques have been successful between species such as zebra (Equus burchellii) and horse (Equus caballus; Summers, 1986); mouflon (Ovis musimon) and sheep (Ovis aries; Bunch, Foote & Whitaker, 1977); gaur (Bos gaurus) and domestic cattle (Bos tuurus; Stover & Evans, 1984), and bongo (Tragelaphus euiyceros) and eland (Tragelaphus oryx ;Dresser et al, 1984). Inter-subspecific embryo transfer could be applied using safe subspecies as recipients for embryos collected from subspecies classified as critical or endangered.…”
Section: Interspecijic Embryo Transfer and Maternal Recognition Of Prmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In bovids, the protocol used depends largely on the size of the animal (Loskutoff and others 1995). For larger bovids, transcervical embryo collection and/or transfer has proved possible in bongo antelope ( Tragelaphus euryceros ), guar ( Bos guarus ), eland ( Taurotragus oryx ), American bison ( Bison bison ), Asiatic buffalo ( Bubalus bubalis ), scimitar‐horned oryx ( Oryx dammah ) and greater kudu ( Tragelaphus imberbis ) (Drost and others 1983, Dresser and others 1984, Pope and others 1988, Loskutoff and others 1990, 1995; Schiewe and others 1991). As less invasive techniques are developed for ET in sheep, they are increasingly being adapted for use in small non‐domestic bovids such as the yellow‐backed duiker ( Caphalophus sylvicultor ) and suni ( Neotragus moschatus zulensis ) (Schiewe and others 1991).…”
Section: The Advantages and Limitations Of Assisted Breeding Techniqumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One solution to this problem is inter‐species embryo transfer, in which females of a related abundant species are used as ‘incubators’ for embryos of the endangered species. Interspecies embryo transfer has been attempted successfully between mouflon ( Ovis musimon ) and sheep (Bunch and others 1977), Bos indicus and Bos taurus (Summers and others 1983), guar and domestic cattle (Stover and Evans 1984), bongo and eland (Dresser and others 1984) and between Przewalski's horse, horse and donkey (Summers and others 1987).…”
Section: The Advantages and Limitations Of Assisted Breeding Techniqumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The common eland lends itself to this approach due to the large frame of the species and its relatively calm nature. The adaption of such assisted techniques as artificial insemination, embryo transfer and in vitro fertilization are all options to apply to nondomestic reproduction, some of which have been achieved, although with low efficiency (Dresser et al, 1984;Pope et al, 1991;Luskutoff et al, 1990;Schiewe et al, 1991a, b;Morrow et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%