1995
DOI: 10.1016/0093-691x(94)00039-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superovulatory response in anestrous ewes is affected by the presence of a large follicle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistently higher ovulatory responses were elicited when the treatment began on the day of (Nasser et al. 1993; Adams 1994; Rubianes et al. 1995; Mapletoft et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consistently higher ovulatory responses were elicited when the treatment began on the day of (Nasser et al. 1993; Adams 1994; Rubianes et al. 1995; Mapletoft et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The ovarian response and embryo yield after superovulation in sheep are highly variable (Gonzales‐Bulnes et al. 2004), particularly during seasonal anoestrus (Rubianes et al. 1995), which limits the application of superovulation in the embryo transfer programmes and experimental work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results were in agreement with Samartzi et al (1995) that used varied doses of eCG. The presence of a large growing follicle at the time of a superovulatory dosage of eCG (Rubianes et al 1995) has been reported to decrease ovarian response to LH surge. Bettencourt et al (2008) have also observed an increased ovulation rate following GnRH administration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The major factor leading to the variable ovulation rate and embryo output currently seems to be the follicular status of the donor at the onset of superovulatory treatment (Gonzalez-Bulnes et al, 2004). So for example, the presence of a dominant follicle at the onset of superovulation has been reported to decrease the ovarian response in small ruminants (Rubianes et al, 1995;Lopez-Sebastian et al, 1999;Rubianes & Menchaca, 2003). It is assumed that by lowering the LH concentration, the establishment of a dominant follicle could be avoided, and therefore more follicles will have the opportunity to develop and ovulate under (Gonzalez-Bulnes et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%