2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.81.205212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superparamagnetism in MgO-based magnetic tunnel junctions with a thin pinned ferromagnetic electrode

Abstract: MgO-based magnetic tunnel junctions have been fabricated with a thin Co 40 Fe 40 B 20 ͑CoFeB͒ layer in the pinned synthetic antiferromagnetic CoFe/Ru/CoFeB stack. An inverted tunneling magnetoresistance is observed due to the unbalanced synthetic antiferromagnet. Superparamagnetic nanoparticles form when the CoFeB layer is thinner than 1.5 nm, and an abnormal temperature dependence of the junction resistance is associated with superparamagnetism when the thermal fluctuation energy exceeds the magnetic anisotro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was suggested that the effect of Ta migration to the CoFeB/MgO interface accounts for the reduction of and thus degradation of PMA at high annealing temperatures. In addition, it has been suggested that superparamagnetic nanoparticles are formed in the thin CoFeB layer adjacent the MTJ interface [9], [10]. In the study of the tunneling resistance as a function of temperature, Feng et al observed an abnormal temperature dependence of the junction resistance [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was suggested that the effect of Ta migration to the CoFeB/MgO interface accounts for the reduction of and thus degradation of PMA at high annealing temperatures. In addition, it has been suggested that superparamagnetic nanoparticles are formed in the thin CoFeB layer adjacent the MTJ interface [9], [10]. In the study of the tunneling resistance as a function of temperature, Feng et al observed an abnormal temperature dependence of the junction resistance [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition, it has been suggested that superparamagnetic nanoparticles are formed in the thin CoFeB layer adjacent the MTJ interface [9], [10]. In the study of the tunneling resistance as a function of temperature, Feng et al observed an abnormal temperature dependence of the junction resistance [9]. They have suggested that the anomaly may arise either from spin-flip scattering associated with thermal fluctuations of interfacial superparamagnetic nanoparticles [11] or an extra magnetic coupling occurs due to the blocking of the nanoparticles at low temperatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are still not sure the origin of this difference. However, as pointed out in [54], a dipole field (H dip ) from the SAF pinned reference layer, which is different from H offset inducing the overall shift of RH loops, may stabilize one of the magnetic configurations, while destabilize the other, i.e., the actual H offset for AP and P states are different.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As expected from the I-PMA, H c increases as t FL decreases until t FL < 1 nm. For t FL > 1 nm, the PMA becomes unstable due to formation of superparamagnetic phase [53], [54]. As EF is confined within a few monolayers at the interface, the influence of EF on the PMA is effectively only at the interface.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11][12][13][14] When the free layer thickness is below a critical value, it breaks up into nanoislands on the MgO surface, which are superparamagnetic. [11][12][13][14][15] Realizing a linear response in DBMTJs, which have better bias dependence of TMR compared to SB-MTJs, [16][17][18] is advantageous for sensor applications. In addition to the linear response, a low noise level is necessary for sensor applications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%