SuperPATH and Micro-superior Total Hip Arthroplasty

Chow, James C.Y.; Torre, Paul K. Della; Fitch, David A.

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-34109-5_135

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Superpath ®1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2018

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Stability and range of motion is tested, and the capsule and soft tissues are repaired before standard closure is performed. [42] This approach was developed to allow for the perceived advantages of the each of its predecessors, preserving the iliotibial band and external rotators, with in-line axial femoral preparation prior to the femoral neck cut as in the Su-perCap ® approach and allowing for consistent acetabular reaming through the accessory portal as in the PATH ® approach.…”

Section: Superpath ®mentioning

confidence: 99%

Understanding Iliotibial Band-Sparing Total Hip Arthroplasty: Alternatives to Traditional THA Approaches

Nevins¹,

Sagers

2018

ReconRev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Excellent long term results in total hip arthroplasty (THA are achievable through a variety of surgical techniques. However, the push for cost savings and higher patient expectations has shifted the focus to improving short term outcomes such as length of stay and in-hospital narcotic requirements. While approximately 87% of surgeons worldwide continue to prefer traditional posterolateral (PL) or lateral approaches for arthroplasty,1alternative approaches that spare the iliotibial band have emerged over the last several years in hopes of improved outcomes. This review explores the iliotibial band-sparing approaches, their advantages and disadvantages, and provides an overview of their published results.

show abstract

Section: Superpath ®mentioning

confidence: 99%