2020
DOI: 10.3390/rs12203421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superpixel-Based Shallow Convolutional Neural Network (SSCNN) for Scanned Topographic Map Segmentation

Abstract: Motivated by applications in topographic map information extraction, our goal was to discover a practical method for scanned topographic map (STM) segmentation. We present an advanced guided watershed transform (AGWT) to generate superpixels on STM. AGWT utilizes the information from both linear and area elements to modify detected boundary maps and sequentially achieve superpixels based on the watershed transform. With achieving an average of 0.06 on under-segmentation error, 0.96 on boundary recall, and 0.95… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future work will include the test of alternative clustering or unsupervised classification techniques that infer the optimum number of clusters from the data [ 94 , 95 ], as well as the use of different color space representations [ 96 ]. Future work will also include the performance of object-based methods [ 57 , 64 ] as compared to the pixel-based extraction method presented herein.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Future work will include the test of alternative clustering or unsupervised classification techniques that infer the optimum number of clusters from the data [ 94 , 95 ], as well as the use of different color space representations [ 96 ]. Future work will also include the performance of object-based methods [ 57 , 64 ] as compared to the pixel-based extraction method presented herein.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such recent efforts include the mining of (historical) map collections by their content or associated metadata [ 32 - 37 ], automated georeferencing [ 18 , 38 - 40 ] and alignment [ 41 , 42 ], text detection and recognition [ 43 - 45 ], and the extraction of thematic map content, often involving (deep) machine learning methods, focusing on specific geographic features such as forest [ 46 ], railroads [ 33 , 47 ], road network intersections [ 48 , 49 ] and road types [ 50 ], archeological content [ 51 ] and mining features [ 52 ], cadastral parcels boundaries [ 53 , 54 ], wetlands and other hydrographic features [ 55 , 56 ], linear features in general [ 57 ], land cover/land use [ 58 ], urban street networks and city blocks [ 34 ], building footprints [ 13 , 59 , 60 ], and historical human settlement patterns [ 61 - 63 ]. Other approaches use deep-learning-based computer vision for generic segmentation of historical maps [ 64 , 65 ], generative machine learning approaches for map style transfer [ 66 , 67 ], or attempt to mimic historical overhead imagery based on historical maps [ 68 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al [24] explored the recognition of text on topographic maps using DL while Uhl et al [25] investigated the mapping of human settlements from maps using CNNs. Lui et al [41] explored CNNs for the general segmentation of topographic maps. There has been some success in applying DL methods to other types of digital data, beyond the primary focus on multispectral satellite or aerial imagery.…”
Section: Surface Mine Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such recent efforts include the mining of (historical) map collections by their content or associated metadata [32][33][34][35][36][37], automated georeferencing [18,[38][39][40] and alignment [41,42], text detection and recognition [43][44][45], or the extraction of thematic map content, often involving (deep) machine learning methods, focusing on specific geographic features such as forest [46], railroads [33,47], road network intersections [48,49] and road types [50], archeological content [51] and mining features [52], cadastral parcels boundaries [53,54], wetlands and other hydrographic features [55,56], linear features in general [57], land cover / land use [58], urban street networks and city blocks [34], building footprints [13,59,60] and historical human settlement patterns [61][62][63]. Other approaches use deep learning based computer vision for generic segmentation of historical maps [64,65], generative machine learning approaches for map style transfer [66,67] or attempt to mimic historical overhead imagery based on historical maps [68].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%