2008
DOI: 10.1016/s0034-4877(08)80036-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superposition principle and the problem of additivity of the energies and momenta of distinct electromagnetic fields

Abstract: In this paper we prove in a rigorous mathematical way (using the Clifford bundle formalism) that the energies and momenta of two distinct and arbitrary free Maxwell fields (of finite energies and momenta) that are superposed are additive and thus that there is no incompatibility between the principle of superposition of fields and the principle of energy-momentum conservation, contrary to some recent claims. Our proof depends on a noticeable formula for the energy-momentum densities, namely, Riesz formula ⋆T a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) energy conservation between fluctuating kinetic and potential energies and (2) destructive interference elsewhere in the waveform, which cancels the effect of the increase in local energy (Notte-Cuello and Rodrigues, 2008;Matthews, 1985). The phase-delayed array of emitters (N À 1)*t pd increased the total time of flight of the signal compared to a traditional excitation by a single emitter.…”
Section: E Energy-normalized Gain Of Phase-delayed Excitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) energy conservation between fluctuating kinetic and potential energies and (2) destructive interference elsewhere in the waveform, which cancels the effect of the increase in local energy (Notte-Cuello and Rodrigues, 2008;Matthews, 1985). The phase-delayed array of emitters (N À 1)*t pd increased the total time of flight of the signal compared to a traditional excitation by a single emitter.…”
Section: E Energy-normalized Gain Of Phase-delayed Excitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Please, do not confuse the variational symbol δ with the symbol δ of the Hodge coderiviative. 4 £ ξ denotes the Lie derivative in the direction of the vector field ξ.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For that reason, such waves are (equivocated) called by some authors non-diffracting waves, which of course is not the case, because they spread sensibly after travelling a distance greater than the depth of the field. That such spreading necessarily occurs has been rigorously proved in[45] and it is necessary in order to have energy conservation in certain well defined situations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%