2018
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/990/1/012002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superposition principle for the continuity equation in a bounded domain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was first introduced in the Euclidean setting by Ambrosio in [4], where it was employed to investigate uniqueness and stability of Lagrangian flows in the context of DiPerna-Lions Theory [23]. Since then it has been applied to different tasks [5,10,11,12,13] and extended to various settings [15,31,34,41]. In [4] the velocity field v is assumed to satisfy (5) ˆ1 0 ˆΩ |v(t, x)| 2 dρ t (x) dt < ∞ .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was first introduced in the Euclidean setting by Ambrosio in [4], where it was employed to investigate uniqueness and stability of Lagrangian flows in the context of DiPerna-Lions Theory [23]. Since then it has been applied to different tasks [5,10,11,12,13] and extended to various settings [15,31,34,41]. In [4] the velocity field v is assumed to satisfy (5) ˆ1 0 ˆΩ |v(t, x)| 2 dρ t (x) dt < ∞ .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, for each (a x,ȳ ) x,ȳ∈S ∈ A(β 1 S , β 2 S ), we have that Taking the minimum w.r.t. elements of A(β 1 , β 2 ), we arrive at the second inequality in (20).…”
Section: Appendix a Distances Between Measures On A Finite Setmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Extend the particle trajectories from (1.9) by X x t := lim s↑tx X x s ∈ ∂Ω for all t ≥ t x , and let Ω t := {X x t | x ∈ Ω & t x > t} for all t ∈ [0, T ) (these sets are open due to (3.1)). Then the lemma essentially follows from Theorem 2 in [3] but in order to apply it, we need to show that ω weakly satisfies some boundary conditions on (0, T ) × ∂Ω (even though these do not affect the result). To this end we employ Theorem 3.1 and Remark 3.1 in [4], which show that there is indeed some κ ∈ L ∞ ((0, T ) × ∂Ω) such that…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 11(i)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(In fact, the measure in [3] is supported on the set of all maximal solutions to the ODE d dt Y (t) = u(t, Y (t)) on (0, T ), and the relevant formula holds for all ψ ∈ C ∞ 0 (R d ). But this becomes (3.2) when restricted to the ψ above, with η the restriction of the measure from [3] to the set of solutions {{X x t } t∈(0,T ) | x ∈ Ω}. This is because uniqueness of solutions for the ODE shows that the other solutions have Y (t) /…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 11(i)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation