1993
DOI: 10.1364/josaa.10.000059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superresolving scanning optical microscopy using holographic optical processing

Abstract: Two novel superrresolving scanning microscopes, one of which uses coherent imaging and the other incoherent imaging, are described. The optical arrangement used in the coherent microscope is similar to that in a scanning confocal microscope with the detector pinhole replaced by a special holographic mask, a Fourier lens, and a pinhole. The incoherent design uses two intensity-transmittance masks, two integrating detectors, and an electronic subtractor. The design of the microscopes is based on the results of s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the illumination pattern is physical, it cannot take negative values. The mask’s transmittance cannot be negative either, unless special detection configurations are utilized 50. Thus there is always a DC component in the “carrier wave”, corresponding to the h̃ ex (0) δ ( k ) term in eq 12.…”
Section: Digital Implementation Of Spin and Spadementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the illumination pattern is physical, it cannot take negative values. The mask’s transmittance cannot be negative either, unless special detection configurations are utilized 50. Thus there is always a DC component in the “carrier wave”, corresponding to the h̃ ex (0) δ ( k ) term in eq 12.…”
Section: Digital Implementation Of Spin and Spadementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of superresolution has an allure that continues to attract researchers with its promise of achieving better resolution than the limit that is nominally associated with an instrument, [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] i.e., better than that given by the Rayleigh criterion (or Rayleigh limit). This limit is conventionally expressed by the statement that for imaging at a wavelength l with an aperture whose maximum dimension is D, two point sources cannot be resolved if their apparent angular separation is less than l͞D.…”
Section: Superresolution and The Rayleigh Limitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of coherent optical processing to improve the lateral resolution of incoherent imaging has thus far received only modest attention, as prior proposals [13,[20][21][22][23][24][25] either did not demonstrate any substantial improvement or neglected the important effect of noise. Using quantum optics and parameter estimation theory, here I show that, for any object too small to be resolved by diffraction-limited direct imaging, SPADE can estimate its second or higher moments much more precisely than direct imaging can fundamentally do in the presence of photon shot noise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%