2014
DOI: 10.2514/1.a32650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supersonic Retropropulsion Experimental Results from NASA Ames 9×7 Foot Supersonic Wind Tunnel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data surveyed inform the effects of variations in nozzles, nozzle configurations, and aerodynamics parameters, primarily sourced from NASA wind tunnel testing conducted in the era of the Viking Mars lander development [1,[7][8][9][10]. A pair of NASA wind tunnel tests in 2010 and 2011 expanded upon legacy efforts through parametric investigation of single and multiple nozzle configurations across a range of supersonic Mach numbers and thrust coefficients [4,5]. This most recent testing incorporated modern pressure instrumentation and examined a number of multiple nozzle arrangements and a range of flow conditions.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Srp Ai Scaling Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The data surveyed inform the effects of variations in nozzles, nozzle configurations, and aerodynamics parameters, primarily sourced from NASA wind tunnel testing conducted in the era of the Viking Mars lander development [1,[7][8][9][10]. A pair of NASA wind tunnel tests in 2010 and 2011 expanded upon legacy efforts through parametric investigation of single and multiple nozzle configurations across a range of supersonic Mach numbers and thrust coefficients [4,5]. This most recent testing incorporated modern pressure instrumentation and examined a number of multiple nozzle arrangements and a range of flow conditions.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Srp Ai Scaling Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, several of the tests incorporated variations in nozzle and/or model geometry. In contrast, the recent NASA testing was specifically designed to provide experimental data to be used for validation of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) codes and to re-establish the capability to investigate these interference effects through ground testing [4,5]. This testing also incorporated variations in nozzle (and therefore plume) configuration without replication of the historical references for multiple nozzle data.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Srp Ai Scaling Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first cell off the vehicle has the same height as the adjacent cell at the nozzle exit. The parameters stretch, N k,2 and N k, 3 in Table 2 may be used to control the position of the elliptical inflow boundary to accommodate large penetrations of the jet into the free stream. The resulting grid for configuration C1 is shown in Figs.…”
Section: A Single Axisymmetric Conical Nozzlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the UPWT test at high supersonic Mach number conditions, data were also obtained in a LaRC-led test at lower supersonic Mach numbers in the Ames Research Center (ARC) 9x7-Foot Supersonic Wind Tunnel (Ref. 67). The model used in the prior LaRC UPWT test was also used in this study.…”
Section: B Supersonic Retropropulsionmentioning
confidence: 99%