2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2010.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superspin glass state in MnFe2O4 nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
43
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
11
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As discussed earlier (Figure 2(b)), by increasing the calcination temperature of the MnFe 2 O 4 nanoparticles, Fe 3+ ions transferred from B site to A site, so, consequently, the accumulation of Fe 3+ ions increased in A site; however, the Fe A 3+ -Fe B 3+ superexchange interactions increased (Fe A 3+ -Fe B 3+ interactions were twice as strong as the Mn A 2+ -Fe B 3+ interactions), and this can lead to an increase in saturation magnetization in MnFe 2 O 4 nanoparticles [34]. Aslibeiki et al [35] showed that saturation magnetization increases with increasing temperature and particle size in MnFe 2 O 4 nanoparticles.It has been reported [36] that the spin disorder may occur on the surface of the nanoparticles as well as within the cores of the nanoparticles due to vacant sublattice disorder sites (Fe A 3+ ) and poor crystal structure. The other point that is understood from Table 1 is that the values of saturation magnetization are expressively lower than those reported for the bulk MnFe 2 O 4 (80 emu/g) [37].…”
Section: Phase Composition and Morphology Of Precursors Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed earlier (Figure 2(b)), by increasing the calcination temperature of the MnFe 2 O 4 nanoparticles, Fe 3+ ions transferred from B site to A site, so, consequently, the accumulation of Fe 3+ ions increased in A site; however, the Fe A 3+ -Fe B 3+ superexchange interactions increased (Fe A 3+ -Fe B 3+ interactions were twice as strong as the Mn A 2+ -Fe B 3+ interactions), and this can lead to an increase in saturation magnetization in MnFe 2 O 4 nanoparticles [34]. Aslibeiki et al [35] showed that saturation magnetization increases with increasing temperature and particle size in MnFe 2 O 4 nanoparticles.It has been reported [36] that the spin disorder may occur on the surface of the nanoparticles as well as within the cores of the nanoparticles due to vacant sublattice disorder sites (Fe A 3+ ) and poor crystal structure. The other point that is understood from Table 1 is that the values of saturation magnetization are expressively lower than those reported for the bulk MnFe 2 O 4 (80 emu/g) [37].…”
Section: Phase Composition and Morphology Of Precursors Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manganese ferrite nanoparticles with different sizes and morphologies have been synthesized by different methods. Some of these methods include ball milling [20], co-precipitation of Mn 2+ and Fe 3+ in aqueous solution [21], reverse micelle [22,23], thermal decomposition [24][25][26][27], and solvothermal method [19]. The last method offers many advantages over the others such as its simplicity, high crystallinity of the products, capability to control the crystal growth and its adequacy for the preparation of large quantities of samples [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods such as hydrothermal [13,14], coprecipitation [15], thermal decomposition [16], sol-gel [17], and ball milling [18] techniques are usually employed for the preparation of spinel ferrites. The above methods have some disadvantages, such as a synthesis time duration that is too long, energy consumption, and the need for a very high temperature calcination step, and hence, further development of these methods is restricted to a certain extent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%