2015
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superstructured Assembly of Nanocarbons: Fullerenes, Nanotubes, and Graphene

Abstract: quent reduction, 88,89 while graphene quantum dots were synthesized from C 60 molecules via the ruthenium-catalyzed cage-opening. 90 Reversely, the transformation of flat graphene sheets into fullerene cages was observed under high energy electron beam exposure; 91 meanwhile, rolling up graphene sheets into CNTs was achievable by means of ultrasonication, 92,93 electron beam irradiation, 94 or thermally induced self-intertwining. 95 By the way, graphene nanoscrolls with an open tubular structure, which are dis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
310
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 476 publications
(312 citation statements)
references
References 715 publications
(1,457 reference statements)
1
310
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the unexpected photonic crystallinity complicates the phase identification of the GO dispersion; 1D photonic crystallinity is usually attributed to lamellar mesophasic ordering. 43 Several additional results have been reported to support the lamellar mesophasic property of the GO dispersion, such as the periodic patterns with pitches of tens of micrometers in the freeze-dried sample 38,44 and small angle X-ray scattering peaks sharper than those in usual small-molecular nematic phases. 30,38,45 However, freeze-dried samples usually lose the original GO assembly structure in a wet colloid and are restructured during freezing; 36,37 small angle X-ray scattering peaks in colloidal nematic phases are commonly sharper than those of small-molecular nematic phases owing to weaker thermal fluctuation, and the types of patterns are commonly interpreted as characteristic patterns of the nematic phase rather than the lamellar phase in clay suspensions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, the unexpected photonic crystallinity complicates the phase identification of the GO dispersion; 1D photonic crystallinity is usually attributed to lamellar mesophasic ordering. 43 Several additional results have been reported to support the lamellar mesophasic property of the GO dispersion, such as the periodic patterns with pitches of tens of micrometers in the freeze-dried sample 38,44 and small angle X-ray scattering peaks sharper than those in usual small-molecular nematic phases. 30,38,45 However, freeze-dried samples usually lose the original GO assembly structure in a wet colloid and are restructured during freezing; 36,37 small angle X-ray scattering peaks in colloidal nematic phases are commonly sharper than those of small-molecular nematic phases owing to weaker thermal fluctuation, and the types of patterns are commonly interpreted as characteristic patterns of the nematic phase rather than the lamellar phase in clay suspensions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…[28,49,50] Gao et al systemically summarized the state-of-the-art progress in fabrication and application of CNT and graphene-based 3D aerogels/hydrogels. [51] Mattevi et al also reviewed recent progress in mesoscale design of multifunctional 3D graphene networks. [52] Thus far, the macroscopic fabrications of 3D CNFs architectures have not been summarized, until now.…”
Section: Wwwadvancedsciencenewscommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the strong interactions between assembled components (strong π–π interaction, van der Waals force, large interaction surfaces between sheets, corrugation at atomic scale, and winkled morphology at the sub‐micrometer scale) and the synergic effect of individual nanocarbon components, the hybridization of two or more constituents usually exhibits more advanced properties than a single component. Thus, such nanocarbon/graphene hybrids have attracted increasing interest during the past decades, especially for hybridization with assembled architectures from macroscopic 1D fibers to 3D structures 60, 61…”
Section: Self‐assembled Graphene‐based Hybrid Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%