2008
DOI: 10.1063/1.2898117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supersymmetric associated vector coherent states and generalized Landau levels arising from two-dimensional supersymmetry

Abstract: We describe a method for constructing vector coherent\ud states for quantum supersymmetric partner Hamiltonians. The method\ud is then applied to such partner Hamiltonians arising from a\ud generalization of the fractional quantum Hall effect. Explicit\ud examples are worked out

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let us take V 1 (x, y) = W 1 (x, y) = − x 2 , V 2 (x, y) = W 2 (x, y) = − y 2 . If we further take α = γ = α ′ = γ ′ = 1 √ 2 we recover exactly the usual situation, [24]. Moreover, we go back to bosonic rather than pseudo-bosonic commutation relations.…”
Section: Generalized Landau Levels (Gll)mentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Let us take V 1 (x, y) = W 1 (x, y) = − x 2 , V 2 (x, y) = W 2 (x, y) = − y 2 . If we further take α = γ = α ′ = γ ′ = 1 √ 2 we recover exactly the usual situation, [24]. Moreover, we go back to bosonic rather than pseudo-bosonic commutation relations.…”
Section: Generalized Landau Levels (Gll)mentioning
confidence: 59%
“…where α γ = 1 2 and α ′ γ ′ = 1 2 . Thus, the operators generalizing the Landau Hamiltonians in [24] are…”
Section: Generalized Landau Levels (Gll)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For information concerning the last states, the reader can seek e.g. [21,22,23] and references therein.…”
Section: Case With F (1) =mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a problem which has been addressed in the literature by several authors and in several different ways, see [8,12,14,15] and references therein. These differences arise mainly because of the non-uniqueness of the definition of what a CS should be.…”
Section: Gazeau-klauder Like Coherent Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%