1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf01017680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supersymmetry and kinetic properties of one-dimensional disordered systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
55
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
4
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other terms the Lyapunov exponent gives a good estimate of the localization length of ϕ n (x) if the statistical properties of the envelope of the solution of the Schrödinger equation is not affected when imposing the second boundary condition. In the high energy limit where processes θ(x) and ξ(x) rapidly decorrelate [15] this is not a problem, however it is not obvious that this holds in any situation (in particular for the supersymmetric Hamiltonian H susy , the 6 This picture suggests that the wave function behaves roughly as ψ(x) ∼ e ±γx × (oscillations), however one should keep in mind that such a simple picture is dangerous since it forgets the important fact that the argument of the exponential, ξ(x), presents large fluctuations increasing like √ x (fluctuations of ξ(x)/x vanish for x → ∞, but not those of ξ(x)). The envelope of the wave function is an exponential of a drifted Brownian motion, what can have important consequences [58] ; neglecting this important feature can lead to wrong conclusion, like in Ref.…”
Section: Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In other terms the Lyapunov exponent gives a good estimate of the localization length of ϕ n (x) if the statistical properties of the envelope of the solution of the Schrödinger equation is not affected when imposing the second boundary condition. In the high energy limit where processes θ(x) and ξ(x) rapidly decorrelate [15] this is not a problem, however it is not obvious that this holds in any situation (in particular for the supersymmetric Hamiltonian H susy , the 6 This picture suggests that the wave function behaves roughly as ψ(x) ∼ e ±γx × (oscillations), however one should keep in mind that such a simple picture is dangerous since it forgets the important fact that the argument of the exponential, ξ(x), presents large fluctuations increasing like √ x (fluctuations of ξ(x)/x vanish for x → ∞, but not those of ξ(x)). The envelope of the wave function is an exponential of a drifted Brownian motion, what can have important consequences [58] ; neglecting this important feature can lead to wrong conclusion, like in Ref.…”
Section: Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, where V (x) is a random function, have been studied in great detail [6] and their properties are rather generic under the asumption that V (x) is correlated on a small length scale and dx V (x)V (0) remains finite 1 : exponential tail in the density of states 2 at low energies (Lifshits singularity) [2,13,14,3,11,15,6] and decreasing Lyapunov exponent (inverse localization length) at high energy [15,6] γ ∝ 1/E for E → +∞. The situation can be quite different if the Hamiltonian possesses some symmetry preserved by the introduction of the random potential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A powerful approach to handle such problems is the phase formalism 6 (presented in refs. [15,157] for instance). This formalism leads to a broad variety of stochastic processes.…”
Section: Overview Of the Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have used the equality in law (15) which implies the following property : given a Brownian bridge (x(τ ), 0 τ t | x(0) = x(t) = 0), for any even function f (x) we…”
Section: Historical Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation