2018 14th Symposium on Neural Networks and Applications (NEUREL) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/neurel.2018.8586992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supervised and Unsupervised Learning of Fetal Heart Rate Tracings with Deep Gaussian Processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results indicate that they cannot be generated from a common manifold, i.e., the FHR and UA encode different information about fetal well-being. This is also consistent with our observations in [29], where the performance of classification of FHR can be improved using features from UA.…”
Section: Real Data: Ctg Segmentsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The results indicate that they cannot be generated from a common manifold, i.e., the FHR and UA encode different information about fetal well-being. This is also consistent with our observations in [29], where the performance of classification of FHR can be improved using features from UA.…”
Section: Real Data: Ctg Segmentsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…(3) Deep Learning approaches-Finally, FHR analysis would benefit from the wider availability of large, documented and shared databases that permit robust evaluation of detection/performance of different machine learning methods. In particular, such data could be used with approaches based on 'deep learning' strategies 36,37 . These are powerful, next generation artificial intelligence approaches, where the computers independently seek what is important in the data and do not rely on human-derived features/characteristics.…”
Section: Signal Processing Methods For Data-driven Computerized Ctgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, transabdominal electrophysiological monitoring can also provide information on uterine activity during labor. Conventional CTG interpretation considers variations in FHR in presence/absence of uterine contractions and recent studies have shown that also computerized CTG interpretation benefits from reliable information on uterine activity 36,37 .…”
Section: Trans-abdominal Fetal Electrocardiogram Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within this category, (n = 6) studies applied some form of data preparation: feature selection [61]- [63], SMOTE [64], and removal of noisy data [65]. One study [66] gathered CTG data from the CTU-UHB Intrapartum Cardiotocography Database, consisting of a total of 552 CTG recordings and applied feature selection techniques for data preparation. In [67], data were collected from the Daisy database in the form of fetal ECG recordings, and data used in [68] was gathered from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) database in the form of maternal abdominal ECG recordings.…”
Section: B Fetal Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supervised learning classification tasks have been performed by all articles in this group, and [61], [62], [65] and [66] also applied unsupervised learning in the form of DR techniques. Clustering techniques (also unsupervised learning) have been reported in [69].…”
Section: B Fetal Statementioning
confidence: 99%