2014
DOI: 10.7312/kadu15176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supervision in Social Work, 5e

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
154
0
24

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 224 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
154
0
24
Order By: Relevance
“…The author believes that the quality of social work supervision is central to the development and maintenance of high standards of social work practice, which includes two elements of educational and supportive functions (Kadushin & Harkness, ). Educational supervision involves providing knowledge and skills, which are necessary tools for effective practice.…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The author believes that the quality of social work supervision is central to the development and maintenance of high standards of social work practice, which includes two elements of educational and supportive functions (Kadushin & Harkness, ). Educational supervision involves providing knowledge and skills, which are necessary tools for effective practice.…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Morrison's ‘4 × 4 × 4’ model (), in which supervision is based upon the four functions of management, mediation, development and personal support, the four activities of experience, reflection, analysis and action planning and the needs of four stakeholders, the child, the worker, the organization and partners (notably, parents are not considered key stakeholders). Kadushin & Harkness () have similarly argued that good supervision requires a combination of education, administration and support.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important characteristic of the informants’ supervision practices was that they were not obliged to spend time with, or be evaluated by, a supervisor, and they could refuse participation without any formal or informal sanctions. Similarly, Kadushin and Harkness’ () descriptions of collusion in ‘games’ between supervisee and supervisor was recognized by a few informants, but a potential larger group‐based game among the nursing staff members, managers, and supervisors undercutting supervision practices was never envisioned and articulated. Collusion (McDermott et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kadushin and Harkness () approached resistance to supervision by depicting interactional ‘games’ between supervisee and supervisor, in which they collude to produce hidden payoffs for both supervisee and supervisor. They described four sets of games with different elements and outcomes: (i) manipulating demand levels on the supervisee; (ii) reducing the level of demands on the supervisee by redefining the supervisory relationship; (iii) reducing power disparity; and (iv) controlling the situation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%