2009
DOI: 10.1080/13691450802220990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supervision reviewed: reflections on two different social work models in England and Sweden

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
45
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is consistent with recommended supervision practice (Edwards et al, 2005;Spence, Cantrell, Christie, & Samet, 2002) however many studies report that supervisees have their clinical supervisor allocated to them rather than supervisees receiving any choice (Bradley & Hojer, 2009;Dawson et al, 2012).…”
Section: Supervision Arrangementssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This result is consistent with recommended supervision practice (Edwards et al, 2005;Spence, Cantrell, Christie, & Samet, 2002) however many studies report that supervisees have their clinical supervisor allocated to them rather than supervisees receiving any choice (Bradley & Hojer, 2009;Dawson et al, 2012).…”
Section: Supervision Arrangementssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In addition, although some studies of allied health professionals have accessed the impact of specific procedural aspects of clinical supervision, such as supervision training (Kavanagh et al, 2008), and supervision format (Livni et al, 2012), no other identified study has considered the impact of a suite of procedural practices. Therefore, a definition of "Best practice" clinical supervision was developed based on principles identified in the clinical supervision literature (Bradley & Hojer, 2009;Clinical Education and Training Queensland, 2010;Clinical Education and Training Institute, 2011;) and was defined as meeting all of the following five criteria: Based on the above criteria, a "Best practice" group could then be compared to a "Less than best practice group". Analysis using independent-samples t-test was undertaken to determine any differences between the two groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations