2021
DOI: 10.1109/tac.2020.3037156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supervisory Control of Fair Discrete-Event Systems: A Canonical Temporal Logic Foundation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our approach remedies the shortcoming that ω−nonblockingness is not guaranteed in the infinite behavior obtained by the Thistle's approach [3]- [5]. Moreover, our approach imposes no additional restrictions compared with the Seow's approach [6].…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our approach remedies the shortcoming that ω−nonblockingness is not guaranteed in the infinite behavior obtained by the Thistle's approach [3]- [5]. Moreover, our approach imposes no additional restrictions compared with the Seow's approach [6].…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…3) To depict livelock-freeness from the perspective of languages, we propose the definition of markability of a given ω−language to ensure that the infinite strings will always visit some marker states. This definition differs from the marker states in the definition of M−directingness [6], where the marker states are similar to states in the Büchi acceptance criterion. Moreover, properties and computation approaches related to markability are also presented.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in general, it is difficult to convert the desired property into a formal language precisely. To overcome this issue, temporal logic has been leveraged [15]- [18]. It has been developed in computer engineering fields as a formalism of formal specifications [19], [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof: We choose an optimal directed controller SV d * arbitrarily. To establish (18), it is sufficient to show that, for any s ∈ S ⊗ and any ρ ∈ Inf P ath Proposition 2: Given a product SDES D ⊗ associated with an LTL formula ϕ and the reward function R defined as (4), for any optimal directed controller SV d * and any state s ∈ S ⊗ , the following equation holds.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%