Supplemental Career Paths for Air Force Pilots: A Warrant Officer Component or an Aviation Technical Track?

Abstract

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest.RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR2617Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2018 RAND CorporationR® is a registered trademark.iii PrefaceIn response to congressional staff interest, the U.S. Air Force Director of Military Force Management Policy asked RAND Project AIR FORCE (PAF) to compare force sustainment and cost considerations for introducing a component within the pilot workforce that is restricted largely to continuous flying duty. We considered two options: a warrant officer component, comparable to the Army aviation warrant officer program, and an aviation technical track for commissioned officers. Neither would replace the current career path but rather would supplement it in ways intended to be retention-enhancing for some segment of the pilot force. We conducted an analysis of the alternatives as a direct-assistance effort, with some supporting analyses performed as part of ongoing work in projects pertaining to aircrew management and pilot retention. Although the concepts examined in this report might be applied in the reserve components, our analysis was limited because of time and resource constraints to the active component. The research reported here was commissioned by the Director of Military Force Management Policy and conducted within the Manpower, Personnel, and Training Program of PAF.This report should be of value to policymakers interested in exploring potential avenues for managing the Air Force's most critical human capital-its pilot workforce. Pilots are expensive to produce and difficult to retain because of competing economic opportunities. Maintaining an appropriately experienced workforce requires careful calibration of inventory stocks and flows that is easily tipped out of balance. Like with all departures from the currently calibrated system, the potential introduction of alternative human capital approaches should be carefully ...

The United States Air Force pilot diversity dilemma

“…Army Recruiting Command, 2021). A study by Robbert et al . (2018) discussed the warrant officer program in the Air Force.…”

“…However, the degree requirement is not consistent across all military branches; for example, the Army allows warrant officers to fly certain fixed-wing and rotary aircraft, and warrant officers are only required to have a high school diploma or GED (U.S. Army Recruiting Command, 2021). A study by Robbert et al (2018) discussed the warrant officer program in the Air Force. The Air Force had warrant officers until 1980 when they were phased out in favor of higher enlisted grades; however, this did not support the flying community since there have been no enlisted pilots until recently with remotely piloted aircraft.…”

Personnel Needs for Department of the Air Force Digital Talent: A Case Study of Software Factories

“…The DAF may need to either establish technical core specialties or use a technical career track model for officers within the cyber community. A technical career track model has been considered for DAF pilots and requires planning to ensure that the broader community can be sustained while supporting a technical track (Robbert et al, 2018).…”

Championing the Agile Air Force Officer Career: Examining the Potential Use of New Career Management Flexibilities

“…For officers selected IPZ, sequencing by order of merit would result in higher-merit officers being promoted at or near the beginning of the promotion cycle. On average, this would allow those individuals to pin on 5.5 months earlier than with senioritybased sequencing (Robbert et al, 2018). The effects are more dramatic for individuals selected BPZ.…”