2016 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/cec.2016.7744033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supplementary control for virtual synchronous machine based on adaptive dynamic programming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This review can be used as a guideline for other researchers for future work in the area of VSGs. Advantages Disadvantages [10,12] PI/droop voltage simple and fast configuration rigid and not flexible to sudden changes [66] cascaded control voltage faster response compares with droop controller complex tuning method [15] Krill Herd optimisation voltage optimise the value of the controller parameter to get the best voltage reference value inconsistency to obtain the global optimum of the voltage reference value [22,38] PI/droop frequency easy implementation complex tuning method [27,66] cascaded control frequency combined multiple objective functions under one controller additional measurement required and would complicate the tuning process of the controller [13] PI with self-tuning frequency easy implementation and able to operate under uncertain operating conditions complex tuning method and high tuning time required [14] hybrid control frequency robust controller against fault during grid voltages unbalances condition requires two types of controller at the same time [28] derivative control frequency reduce the first overshoot of frequency responses complex tuning method [31] adaptive dynamic frequency reduce d-axis overshoot, the faster response of d-axis current control, fault ride-through capability by ignoring the effect of the q-axis, the synchronous reference frame controller is not complete [16] FL controller frequency reduce the frequency oscillation further compared with the PI controller under continuous load disturbances difficulty in determining membership function [32] PID with self-tuning OD able to optimise the virtual acceleration according to the RoCoF controller does not react well when the reference power change [13,39] PI with self-tuning OD easy to design and applied complex tuning method and high reaction time [33] adaptive control OD reduce the controller sensitivity and enhanced transient response by increasing the fault CCT initial oscillation response is still high [34] linear control theory OD overcome the unstable low-frequency oscillation and improve the OD complex tuning method [67] bang-bang control OD improve the efficiency of the transient by alternating the inertia/eliminate the transient energy/reduce the oscillation overshoot earlier, faster high-frequency moment of inertia change causes the voltage to oscillate at high frequency as well [35] SRA OD eliminate oscillation during the transition from islanding to the grid or vice versa. Reduced the oscillation to minimal during disturbances to the grid initial voltage spike is higher compared with the n...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This review can be used as a guideline for other researchers for future work in the area of VSGs. Advantages Disadvantages [10,12] PI/droop voltage simple and fast configuration rigid and not flexible to sudden changes [66] cascaded control voltage faster response compares with droop controller complex tuning method [15] Krill Herd optimisation voltage optimise the value of the controller parameter to get the best voltage reference value inconsistency to obtain the global optimum of the voltage reference value [22,38] PI/droop frequency easy implementation complex tuning method [27,66] cascaded control frequency combined multiple objective functions under one controller additional measurement required and would complicate the tuning process of the controller [13] PI with self-tuning frequency easy implementation and able to operate under uncertain operating conditions complex tuning method and high tuning time required [14] hybrid control frequency robust controller against fault during grid voltages unbalances condition requires two types of controller at the same time [28] derivative control frequency reduce the first overshoot of frequency responses complex tuning method [31] adaptive dynamic frequency reduce d-axis overshoot, the faster response of d-axis current control, fault ride-through capability by ignoring the effect of the q-axis, the synchronous reference frame controller is not complete [16] FL controller frequency reduce the frequency oscillation further compared with the PI controller under continuous load disturbances difficulty in determining membership function [32] PID with self-tuning OD able to optimise the virtual acceleration according to the RoCoF controller does not react well when the reference power change [13,39] PI with self-tuning OD easy to design and applied complex tuning method and high reaction time [33] adaptive control OD reduce the controller sensitivity and enhanced transient response by increasing the fault CCT initial oscillation response is still high [34] linear control theory OD overcome the unstable low-frequency oscillation and improve the OD complex tuning method [67] bang-bang control OD improve the efficiency of the transient by alternating the inertia/eliminate the transient energy/reduce the oscillation overshoot earlier, faster high-frequency moment of inertia change causes the voltage to oscillate at high frequency as well [35] SRA OD eliminate oscillation during the transition from islanding to the grid or vice versa. Reduced the oscillation to minimal during disturbances to the grid initial voltage spike is higher compared with the n...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the limitation of coefficient tuning in the PI controller, controllers based on intelligent technique are developed [15, 16, 31, 32]. For example, adaptive dynamic programming (ADP) is used as a supplementary controller to stabilise the I d current of the d – q ‐axis to effectively track the reference current [31]. The ADP controller will adapt to different key parameters under different faults with the help of its neural network (NN) weights updating rules.…”
Section: Control Of Vsgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficiency of VSMs depends on PI control‐based current source inverter. Malla et al has proposed an adaptive dynamic programming‐based supplementary controller for performance enhancement of the system. A VSM connected to solar‐ and wind‐based hybrid power system is shown in Figure .…”
Section: Limitations and Constraints Of Renewable Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The control framework designed with ADP assists in establishing a robust and optimal control concurrently by solving the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equations of optimal control iteratively using the reinforcement learning concept [27]. Similar techniques have been endorsed to tackle different power systems problems [28][29][30][31][32][33]. A preliminary study on implementation of APC method with constant droop and ADP control on a simplified distribution model has been presented in [34,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%