2018
DOI: 10.3846/20294913.2017.1295289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supplier selection in Telecom supply chain management: a Fuzzy-Rasch based COPRAS-G method

Abstract: Abstract. In the past decade, global competition are forcing firms to increase their level of outsourcing for raw or semi-finished products and building long term relationship with their supply chain partners. The objective is to present a wide-ranging decision making technique for ranking supplier alternatives in view of the effect of selected criteria. A proposed method is developed aiming the usage of Fuzzy-Rasch model applying five point Likert scale for criteria weight and Grey based COmplex PRoportional … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zheng et al [50] proposed a hesitant fuzzy linguistic COPRAS method and applied the same for medical application. Chatterjee and Kar [5,51] presented a hybrid model by extending the COPRAS method fuzzy and Z-number context and used the same for the evaluation of the telecommunication industry and renewable energy sources.…”
Section: Q-rofs Based Copras Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zheng et al [50] proposed a hesitant fuzzy linguistic COPRAS method and applied the same for medical application. Chatterjee and Kar [5,51] presented a hybrid model by extending the COPRAS method fuzzy and Z-number context and used the same for the evaluation of the telecommunication industry and renewable energy sources.…”
Section: Q-rofs Based Copras Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, attention paid to the ARAS method, a relatively novel tool for MCDM (Turskis & Zavadskas, 2010a, 2010bZavadskas & Turskis, 2010), according to the theory that states that the accurate understanding of the world complex phenomena is possible through simple relative comparisons (Buyukozkan & Gocer, 2018;Heidary Dahooie, Beheshti Jazan Abadi, Vanaki, & Firoozfar, 2018;Liao, Fu, & Wu, 2015;Tamosaitiene, Zavadskas, Sileikaite, & Turskis, 2017) The ARAS method adopts the optimality degree concept to find the ranking. It is equal to the sum of weighted normalised values of the criteria with respect to each of the alternatives divided by the sum of weighted normalised values of the best option (Chatterjee & Kar, 2018;Ecer, 2018;Heidary Dahooie, Zavadskas, Abolhasani, Vanaki, & Turskis, 2018;Rostamzadeh, Esmaeili, Nia, Saparauskas, & Keshavarz Ghorabaee, 2017;Sivilevicius, Daniunas, Zavadskas, Turskis, & Susinskas, 2012;Turskis, Kersuliene, & Vinogradova, 2017;Turskis, Morkunaite, & Kutut, 2017) Step 1: First, an m  n decision matrix is formed, where m represents the alternatives and n represents the criteria.…”
Section: Additive Ratio Assessment (Aras) Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, many different MCDM methods are used to solve the supplier selection problem. For example, the best worst method (Rezaei et al, 2016), linguistic MCDM method (Cid-Lopez et al, 2016), fuzzy EDAS , TOPSIS-MMD (Aouadni et al, 2017), intuitionistic VIKOR (Zhao et al, 2017), fuzzy Rasch based COPRAS-G (Chatterjee & Kar, 2018) and neutrosophic DEMATEL (Abdel-Basset et al, 2018). The green supplier selection problem takes into account also environmental factors, unlike the common supplier selection problem.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%