“…Recently, attention paid to the ARAS method, a relatively novel tool for MCDM (Turskis & Zavadskas, 2010a, 2010bZavadskas & Turskis, 2010), according to the theory that states that the accurate understanding of the world complex phenomena is possible through simple relative comparisons (Buyukozkan & Gocer, 2018;Heidary Dahooie, Beheshti Jazan Abadi, Vanaki, & Firoozfar, 2018;Liao, Fu, & Wu, 2015;Tamosaitiene, Zavadskas, Sileikaite, & Turskis, 2017) The ARAS method adopts the optimality degree concept to find the ranking. It is equal to the sum of weighted normalised values of the criteria with respect to each of the alternatives divided by the sum of weighted normalised values of the best option (Chatterjee & Kar, 2018;Ecer, 2018;Heidary Dahooie, Zavadskas, Abolhasani, Vanaki, & Turskis, 2018;Rostamzadeh, Esmaeili, Nia, Saparauskas, & Keshavarz Ghorabaee, 2017;Sivilevicius, Daniunas, Zavadskas, Turskis, & Susinskas, 2012;Turskis, Kersuliene, & Vinogradova, 2017;Turskis, Morkunaite, & Kutut, 2017) Step 1: First, an m Ă n decision matrix is formed, where m represents the alternatives and n represents the criteria.…”