2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supply chain capabilities, risks, and resilience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
369
2
16

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 441 publications
(399 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
12
369
2
16
Order By: Relevance
“…Research suggests that resilience elements are a function of disruption intensity: frequency of occurrence and intensity of impact (Brusset and Teller, 2017;Ambulkar et al, 2015;Bode et al, 2011). Besides, Wong et al (2019) find that while supply chain resilience has stronger positive associations with both risk performance and market performance at high levels of supply-side, infrastructure, and catastrophic disruptions, its effect on financial performance is not contingent upon these forms of disruptions.…”
Section: The Moderating Role Of Operational Disruptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Research suggests that resilience elements are a function of disruption intensity: frequency of occurrence and intensity of impact (Brusset and Teller, 2017;Ambulkar et al, 2015;Bode et al, 2011). Besides, Wong et al (2019) find that while supply chain resilience has stronger positive associations with both risk performance and market performance at high levels of supply-side, infrastructure, and catastrophic disruptions, its effect on financial performance is not contingent upon these forms of disruptions.…”
Section: The Moderating Role Of Operational Disruptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This perspective assumes that a system's ability to effectively respond to disruptions, in terms of absorbing and recovering from impacts and repositioning itself in the face of disruptions, is determined by the system's score on IBR scales. Key IBR elements used to capture the resilience construct include firm flexibility, buffers, visibility, disruption preparedness, agility, collaboration, integration, and information sharing (see e.g., Chowdhury et al, 2019;Brusset and Teller, 2017;Birkie et al, 2017;Liu et al, 2018;Li et al, 2017).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although performance measurement plays a central role in deciding future action, managers do not pay much attention to routine measurement of the effectiveness of resilient actions (Brusset & Teller, ). In fact, extant research showed that the lack of effective measurement systems and measurement metrics has prevented firms from attaining significant improvement in firms' resilient actions (Rajesh, ; Roberta Pereira et al, ).…”
Section: Content Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, firms need improved methods to understand the complex factors that significantly contribute to the development of resilient SCs against disruptions (Brusset & Teller, ; Carmeli et al, ). More specifically, firms need better insights into multiple aspects of SCR such as SCR strategy, measurement, drivers, hindrances and tangible knowledge on the impact of specific factors on resilience.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently there has been growing interest in sustainable supply network design with an emphasis on addressing social, economic, and ecological effects on the business environment. In order to adjust to this constantly changing corporate environment, firms develop dynamic capabilities that lead to long-or short-term sustainable competitive advantages [16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. A number of studies in the SC sustainability literature domain have been focused on static capabilities and dynamic capabilities [16,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%