2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-40160-3_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supply Chain Governance Mechanisms: A Review and Typology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The new governance structure blended formal contracts (patents) with informal trust-based relational governance through extensive socialisation. In contrast with the formal contracts that dominate traditional construction contexts because of their adversarial and opportunistic behaviour (Costa et al , 2019), the cultural dimensions of RCCs in Australia necessitate governance based on informal structural arrangements “designed to influence the behaviour of organisation members based on social control and trust rather than bureaucratic structures” (Ryciuk, 2020, p. 153). Recognising the misfit between standard construction sector approaches and RCC needs was important for the SE to develop a model, underpinned by a simple IP mechanism, that meets RCC requirements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new governance structure blended formal contracts (patents) with informal trust-based relational governance through extensive socialisation. In contrast with the formal contracts that dominate traditional construction contexts because of their adversarial and opportunistic behaviour (Costa et al , 2019), the cultural dimensions of RCCs in Australia necessitate governance based on informal structural arrangements “designed to influence the behaviour of organisation members based on social control and trust rather than bureaucratic structures” (Ryciuk, 2020, p. 153). Recognising the misfit between standard construction sector approaches and RCC needs was important for the SE to develop a model, underpinned by a simple IP mechanism, that meets RCC requirements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Restraint from use of power reflects the reduction of the fear of exploitation behaviour, which promotes genuine commitment between partners (Brown et al, 1995). This prompts partners to exert extra effort, which has a positive effect on alliance performance (Ryciuk, 2020). In addition, Bucklin and Sengupta (1993) find that restraint from use of power creates balance and reduces vulnerability among alliance partners.…”
Section: Cooperation and Alliance Performancementioning
confidence: 99%