2010
DOI: 10.1108/09727981011084968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supply chain modelling using a multi‐agent system

Abstract: PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to focus on a supply chain (SC) simulation of all its management processes by means of a multi‐agent system (MAS).Design/methodology/approachNowadays, the company must develop its activity in an environment characterized by: globalization, hard competitiveness, the necessity of flexibility and of answering dynamically to a changing demand. Thus, a distributed, autonomous approach, strong enough to face changes is necessary, which is what MASs contribute to. An agent can repr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The agents interaction has different levels and it can go from information exchange to cooperation, coordination and negotiation to manage the different activities [25]. The "agentbased modeling is the most appropriate tool for systems with high degree of location and distribution and dominated by discrete decision such as Supply Chain [26]. In fact, Multiagent systems aim to deal Supply Chain complexity such as bullwhip effects, poor communication results, and poor coordination between members of the supply chain [27].…”
Section: Literature Review and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The agents interaction has different levels and it can go from information exchange to cooperation, coordination and negotiation to manage the different activities [25]. The "agentbased modeling is the most appropriate tool for systems with high degree of location and distribution and dominated by discrete decision such as Supply Chain [26]. In fact, Multiagent systems aim to deal Supply Chain complexity such as bullwhip effects, poor communication results, and poor coordination between members of the supply chain [27].…”
Section: Literature Review and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%