2009
DOI: 10.3844/ajeassp.2009.202.211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supply Chain Performance Evaluation: Trends and Challenges

Abstract: Problem statement: In today’s manufacturing world, globalization policies and rejuvenation have created a more intensive competition amongst manufacturers. On the other hand, manufacturers have turned to the option of adopting innovative technologies, process re-engineering and strategies such as efficient supply chain management to achieve a sustainable competitive advantage. Effective supply chain performance measurement has been identified as a key issue towards efficient supply chain management. To … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In real problems in the field, performance evaluation techniques with Fuzzy logic can be used to handle cases such as subjectivity, obscurity, and imprecise information. The application of fuzzy set theory in evaluation systems can improve evaluation results [12].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In real problems in the field, performance evaluation techniques with Fuzzy logic can be used to handle cases such as subjectivity, obscurity, and imprecise information. The application of fuzzy set theory in evaluation systems can improve evaluation results [12].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stages are: Define Measure, Analyze, Improve and Control (DMAIC), (Breyfogle, 2003, Olugu andWong, 2009). Each of these steps has well established goals and contents as following:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The statistical analyses performed on this data were used to draw conclusions of the development plan identified for the team and for the athletes (individual and team level). The statistical tools involved in this study were Minitab (Ryan et al, 2005), analytical approaches (Breyfogle, 2003) and computational tools (Levine et al, 2000;StatSoft, Inc., 2000). Because introduction of the six sigma methodology to sports needs to start with the building blocks for analyses, an a short description is listed here but further reading is advised in (Pande et al, 2000, Breyfogle, 2003.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%