2002
DOI: 10.1145/543812.543832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Support communities for women in computing

Abstract: This article highlights the many activities provided by the support communities available for women in computing. Thousands of women actively participate in these programs and they receive many benefits including networking and professional support. In addition, the organizations and associations help promote the accomplishments of women computer scientists and disseminate valuable information. This article surveys some of these organizations and concludes with a list of suggestions for how faculty members can… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A common claim across an otherwise diverse body of research has been that this exclusion has been produced through a strong relationship between technoscience and men's performance of masculinities (Cockburn 1983(Cockburn , 1985Cockburn and Ormrod 1993;Faulkner 2000;Fergus 1993;Hacker 1989Hacker , 1990Lie 1998;Mellström 1995;Robinson and McIlwee 1991;Wajcman 1991Wajcman , 2004). An exclusion focus has also dominated studies of the gendering of computer science, which have primarily explained the low and declining number of women in higher computer science education in most Western countries through two types of deficit models (Lagesen 2005, 14-18): women's deficits (e.g., Brosnan 1998;Borge et al 1980;Durndell et al 2000;Kramer and Lehman 1990;Maccoby and Jacklin 1974;Siann 1997) and deficits in the educational practices of computer science and its student culture (e.g., Cohoon 2002Cohoon , 2006Gabbert and Meeker 2002;Lagesen 2005;Margolis and Fisher 2002;Roberts, Kassiandou, and Irani 2002;Townsend 2002). Furthermore, discriminatory practices and other minority problems have been identified as produced within the culture of computer science (e.g., Dambrot et al 1985;Spertus 1991;Teague 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common claim across an otherwise diverse body of research has been that this exclusion has been produced through a strong relationship between technoscience and men's performance of masculinities (Cockburn 1983(Cockburn , 1985Cockburn and Ormrod 1993;Faulkner 2000;Fergus 1993;Hacker 1989Hacker , 1990Lie 1998;Mellström 1995;Robinson and McIlwee 1991;Wajcman 1991Wajcman , 2004). An exclusion focus has also dominated studies of the gendering of computer science, which have primarily explained the low and declining number of women in higher computer science education in most Western countries through two types of deficit models (Lagesen 2005, 14-18): women's deficits (e.g., Brosnan 1998;Borge et al 1980;Durndell et al 2000;Kramer and Lehman 1990;Maccoby and Jacklin 1974;Siann 1997) and deficits in the educational practices of computer science and its student culture (e.g., Cohoon 2002Cohoon , 2006Gabbert and Meeker 2002;Lagesen 2005;Margolis and Fisher 2002;Roberts, Kassiandou, and Irani 2002;Townsend 2002). Furthermore, discriminatory practices and other minority problems have been identified as produced within the culture of computer science (e.g., Dambrot et al 1985;Spertus 1991;Teague 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Providing more female role models is generally seen as very important among most people dealing with this issue (Kavanagh & Richardson, 1997;Roberts et al, 2002;Townsend, 2002). In addition, the importance of networking and support communities has been emphasized (Gabbert & Meeker, 2002). Some have argued that if pedagogical changes are introduced to broaden the scope of computer science, this would also attract more women (Salminen-Karlsson, 1999).…”
Section: Educational Reformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1] In many cases, they do. However, once in practice, these groups can actually promote isolation and perpetuate the very stereotypes they were created to combat.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%