2017
DOI: 10.18280/mmc_c.780307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Support Design during Depillaring Operation in Bord and Pillar Panel Using Numerical Simulation Method

Abstract: In an underground coal mine, most successful and economical approach to support the underground structure is roof bolting technology. The most preferred method of working in Indian coal mine is Bord and Pillar. It has been observed from the past histories that, the maximum number of accidents happens during depillaring operation. In this paper, the primary focus is to understand and analyze the roof behavior with roof bolting system in underground coal mine using numerical simulation approach. A three-dimensio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nowadays, the Numerical modelling technique is a widely acceptable and more appropriate technique for support design and stability assessment in underground structures such as tunnels, galleries, junctions, and working face in underground coal mines. Several authors such as [5], [6], [7], [8] has suggested that the numerical tool is far more advanced as compared to an empirical method and they considered FOS to be 1.5 to obtain rock load height for stable cases. The rock mass classification is a prime input parameter in the numerical method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, the Numerical modelling technique is a widely acceptable and more appropriate technique for support design and stability assessment in underground structures such as tunnels, galleries, junctions, and working face in underground coal mines. Several authors such as [5], [6], [7], [8] has suggested that the numerical tool is far more advanced as compared to an empirical method and they considered FOS to be 1.5 to obtain rock load height for stable cases. The rock mass classification is a prime input parameter in the numerical method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%