2015
DOI: 10.1039/c5cc03827h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Support effects in the adsorption of water on CVD graphene: an ultra-high vacuum adsorption study

Abstract: Experimental data for water adsorption on CVD (chemical vapor deposition) graphene/SiO2 and graphene/Cu studied under ultra-high vacuum (UHV) conditions are discussed, focusing on support effects and hydrophobicity. Under UHV, it seems that graphene wettability is inversely related to wetting properties of the support. Graphene is not transparent to water wetting on the supports studied here.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, it was observed by Chakradhar et al. that annealing in UHV conditions at temperatures above 650 K resulted in significant damage to the sample . Our results from Raman spectroscopy (see below) also support this conclusion.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, it was observed by Chakradhar et al. that annealing in UHV conditions at temperatures above 650 K resulted in significant damage to the sample . Our results from Raman spectroscopy (see below) also support this conclusion.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Intercalated water between graphene and Cu(111) can induce graphene fragmentation at line defects . During heating, intercalated molecules can be also trapped in the space between graphene and support, and their desorption can be thus partially inhibited . Although we have identified by XPS a small amount of CO and water species compared to overall carbon amount (concentration ratio CO/C ≤0.05; H 2 O/C ≤0.07), as shown in Figure B and Figure respectively, the majority of desorbed water and CO molecules (Figure A) seem to originate from chemical reactions induced by heating of the sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Since after the dissolving process traces of PMMA might remain on the graphene, it is suggested to anneal for several hours under vacuum at temperatures around 300 °C for graphene surfaces with minimum contaminants. Through this method, graphene‐coated SiO 2 and ZnO samples among others, have been prepared and studied.…”
Section: Preparation Strategies For Graphene‐coated Metal Oxide Supportsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Hydrophobic graphene adsorbed on hydrophilic substrate.) In addition, studies of this kind on different supports revealed support effects, i.e., graphene is not necessarily always hydrophobic [11,12,26]. …”
Section: Water Adsorption On Graphenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, CVD graphene samples bear the potential risk of a high defect density and may have patches on the surface that may be covered by more than one atomic layer of carbon. When I became aware of the discussion in the literature, the obvious task for a surface chemist was to determine the wetting properties at ultra-high vacuum (UHV), clean, conditions [11,12]; preferentially on higher quality physical vapor deposited (PVD) graphene samples [11].…”
Section: Functionalized Graphene and Water Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%