Support for Oregon land‐use planning: A multi‐level analysis

Medler, Jerry; Mushkatel, Alvin H.

doi:10.1080/08920758009361868

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Oregon land use planning was quite controversial (Medler and Mushkatel, 1979) and on three occasions land use planning was challenged by initiative measures (Medler and Mushkatel, 1984). Each time Oregon voters reaffirmed their support for land use planning (Medler and Mushkatel, 1980).…”

Section: Coastal Zone Management In Oregonmentioning

confidence: 99%

Environmental Policy, New Federalism and New Privatism: Policy Conflicts in the Coastal Zone

Medle

Mushkatel

1992

Review of Policy Research

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Public policies developed under the New Federalism of the 1970s and the new privatism of the 1980s have produced a variety of policy problems for states. This is particularly true in the area of environmental policy. This paper looks at environmental policymaking in the coastal zone giving particular attention to the conflicts between the desire to protect renewable resources and the need for economic growth in the coastal zone. These conflicts are illustrated by an examination of comprehensive land use planning in Oregon and the federal government's proposal to develop seabed mining on the Gorda Ridge. Copyright 1992 by The Policy Studies Organization.

show abstract

Section: Coastal Zone Management In Oregonmentioning

confidence: 99%

Environmental Policy, New Federalism and New Privatism: Policy Conflicts in the Coastal Zone

Medle

Mushkatel

1992

Review of Policy Research

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Governors and Environmental Policy

Medler¹

1989

Policy Studies Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The States' Role in Land Use Policy

Mushkatel

Judd

1981

Review of Policy Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Historically, land use had been an exclusively local function. By the early 1960s, a "quiet revolution" broke the local government monopoly over zoning and land use, with a larger state role. Those states which passed land use legislation soon were faced with substantial political opposition, especially from rural dwellers and developers. When Congress considered national land use legislation in the early 1970s. these same interests united in effective opposition. Copyright 1981 by The Policy Studies Organization.

show abstract

Support for Oregon land‐use planning: A multi‐level analysis

Cited by 3 publications

References 5 publications

Environmental Policy, New Federalism and New Privatism: Policy Conflicts in the Coastal Zone

Environmental Policy, New Federalism and New Privatism: Policy Conflicts in the Coastal Zone

Governors and Environmental Policy

The States' Role in Land Use Policy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About