2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10826-010-9378-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Support Networks of Single Puerto Rican Mothers of Children with Disabilities

Abstract: The social support networks of 25 Puerto Rican single mothers of young children with disabilities were examined and compared with current models of family support for children with disabilities. This study was designed to assess the support systems of Latino single mothers in light of dominant models of family support. The Family Support Scale, the ECOMAP, and responses to open-ended questions were employed to describe the characteristics of Puerto Rican single mothers' support systems. Study findings suggest … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, caregiving for sick or disabled family members affects women's careers (Scott 2010). The demands and increased levels of stress of raising a disabled child have been well documented both nationally and internationally (Pakenham, Samios, and Sofronoff 2005;Correa et al 2011). Understanding the complex ramifications of care work on maternal mental health also requires public health inquiry, especially given the increased numbers of children with complex conditions living at home (Burton et al 2008a) and who are cared for primarily by their mothers.…”
Section: Review Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, caregiving for sick or disabled family members affects women's careers (Scott 2010). The demands and increased levels of stress of raising a disabled child have been well documented both nationally and internationally (Pakenham, Samios, and Sofronoff 2005;Correa et al 2011). Understanding the complex ramifications of care work on maternal mental health also requires public health inquiry, especially given the increased numbers of children with complex conditions living at home (Burton et al 2008a) and who are cared for primarily by their mothers.…”
Section: Review Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these methodological differences are evident. Some studies asked respondents about their sources of social support and then coded these responses into conceptually meaningful categories such as “kin,” “friends,” or “professional helpers” (e.g., Messias, Barrington, & Lacy, ; Ornelas, Perreira, Beeber, & Maxwell, ; Garcia, ) or into categories based on theoretical models of the structure of social networks (e.g., Correa, Bonilla, & Reyes‐McPherson, ), while other studies asked respondents to code their social supports into predetermined categories (e.g., Griffith & Villavicencio, ). In addition, some studies assessed the social networks in the context of specific issues that Latino groups needed support with, such as coping with natural disasters (Messias et al., ), parenting children with disabilities (Correa et al., ), pregnancy (DeAnda & Becerra, ), motherhood (Campbell‐Grossman et al., ) or managing chronic illness (Gleeson‐Kreig, Bernal, & Woolley, ), while other studies examined the social network more generally, inquiring about the sources of social support that participants relied on for any of their needs (e.g., Ornelas et al., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of these differences, in most studies participants identified the family (both nuclear and extended) as a key source of support. Among Latina women, mothers (DeAnda, ; Bender & Castro, ; Ornelas et al., ), spouses (DeAnda, ; Ornelas et al., ; Gleeson‐Kreig et al., ), and female relatives (Correa et al., ; Ornelas et al., ) were commonly mentioned. Siblings (Ornelas et al., ; Cantor, Brennan, & Sainz, ; Griffith & Villavicencio, ; DeAnda, ) and children (Gleeson‐Kreig et al., ; Cantor et al., ; Griffith & Villavicencio, ) were other family members frequently cited by Latinos.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations