“…Among these methodological differences are evident. Some studies asked respondents about their sources of social support and then coded these responses into conceptually meaningful categories such as “kin,” “friends,” or “professional helpers” (e.g., Messias, Barrington, & Lacy, ; Ornelas, Perreira, Beeber, & Maxwell, ; Garcia, ) or into categories based on theoretical models of the structure of social networks (e.g., Correa, Bonilla, & Reyes‐McPherson, ), while other studies asked respondents to code their social supports into predetermined categories (e.g., Griffith & Villavicencio, ). In addition, some studies assessed the social networks in the context of specific issues that Latino groups needed support with, such as coping with natural disasters (Messias et al., ), parenting children with disabilities (Correa et al., ), pregnancy (DeAnda & Becerra, ), motherhood (Campbell‐Grossman et al., ) or managing chronic illness (Gleeson‐Kreig, Bernal, & Woolley, ), while other studies examined the social network more generally, inquiring about the sources of social support that participants relied on for any of their needs (e.g., Ornelas et al., ).…”