2009
DOI: 10.1186/1478-4505-7-s1-s6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SUPPORT Tools for Evidence-informed Policymaking in health 6: Using research evidence to address how an option will be implemented

Abstract: This article is part of a series written for people responsible for making decisions about health policies and programmes and for those who support these decision makers.After a policy decision has been made, the next key challenge is transforming this stated policy position into practical actions. What strategies, for instance, are available to facilitate effective implementation, and what is known about the effectiveness of such strategies? We suggest five questions that can be considered by policymakers whe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0
14

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
56
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…The methods used to prepare the policy brief use the SUPPORT Tools for evidenceinformed health policy making (1)(2)(3). The policy brief assesses a health systems problem, potential policy options to address the problem, and strategies for implementing those options.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods used to prepare the policy brief use the SUPPORT Tools for evidenceinformed health policy making (1)(2)(3). The policy brief assesses a health systems problem, potential policy options to address the problem, and strategies for implementing those options.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selecting an appropriate implementation approach can facilitate an effective policy implementation. Strategic planning for the implementation of a policy is needed to facilitate the necessary behavioral and motivational changes in various stakeholders (39). Incomplete implementation of the board of trustees' policy made it unbalanced and superficial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Los artículos revisan a fondo cómo usar la investigación para definir adecuadamente un problema, cómo establecer un marco de opciones posibles para abordar dicho problema, cómo evaluar la aplicabilidad de la evidencia, cómo tener en cuenta la equidad, cómo evaluar los costes de su implementación o incluso cómo monitorizar y evaluar las políticas implementadas. Ha llegado el momento de reflexionar sobre estos y otros muchos temas que plantean estos magníficos 19 artículos 1,[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] , y ha llegado el momento de pedir que todas aquellas personas relacionadas (ya sea de forma directa o indirecta) con la toma de decisiones en políticas nutricionales tomen consciencia de la necesidad urgente de que dicha toma de decisiones sea bien informada a través de la evidencia científica, y hacerles saber que disponen de 18 herramientas estupendas (llamadas SUPPORT tools) para ayudarles en la implementación de un sistema que conduzca a la posibilidad de tener un sistema de gestión de salud más eficiente.…”
Section: E D I T O R I a Lunclassified